Wound healing after harvesting of the internal thoracic and the superior and inferior epigastric arteries

  • Daniel S. Schwartz
  • , Edwin Petrossian
  • , Richard F. Brodman
  • , Rosemary Frame
  • , Jess D. Schwartz
  • , Arie Blitz
  • , David E. McLoughlin
  • , Stanley M. Levenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Wound healing of sternal incisions and midline or paramedian abdominal incisions was studied at 2 weeks postoperatively in three groups of dogs. Group 1, 10 dogs, had harvesting of bilateral internal thoracic arteries, superior epigastric arteries, and inferior epigastric arteries. Group 2, 5 dogs, had removal of the same arteries, but the superior and inferior epigastric arteries were harvested through paramedian rather than midline incisions. Group 3, 5 dogs, served as control and had median sternotomies and midline abdominal incisions only. All wounds healed without complication. Wound breaking strength of the skin of the chest incisions was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the control group (group 3) (52.6 1b) compared with groups 1 (38.0 1b) and 2 (34,8 1b). Wound breaking strength of the skin of the abdominal incisions was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in group 2 (50.4 1b) when paramedian incisions were made compared with group 1 (35.1 1b). Hydroxyproline content was similar for all groups and all incisions. We conclude that abdominal wound breaking strength is significantly greater when paramedian incisions are performed to harvest the inferior epigastric arteries. Harvesting bilateral internal thoracic, superior epigastric, and inferior epigastric arteries may lower sternal wound breaking strength.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1252-1255
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wound healing after harvesting of the internal thoracic and the superior and inferior epigastric arteries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this