Why have we failed to achieve neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease?

C. Warren Olanow, Karl Kieburtz, Anthony H.V. Schapira

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

158 Scopus citations

Abstract

The development of a neuroprotective therapy that slows, stops, or reverses neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease (PD) is the single most important unresolved issue in the management of this disorder. Current therapies provide effective control of symptoms, particularly in the early stages of the disease, but disease progression is associated with the development of "nondopaminergic" features such as postural instability, falling, and dementia that are not adequately controlled with existing medications. There are many promising candidate neuroprotective agents based on pathological and laboratory studies, but to date, it has not been possible to determine that any drug has a disease-modifying effect in PD. Obstacles to the development of a neuroprotective therapy in PD include: (1) uncertainty as to the precise cause of cell death in PD and what to target; (2) the lack of an animal model of PD that precisely reflects the etiopathogenesis of the disease, the pattern of dopaminergic and nondopaminergic pathology, and its chronic, progressive nature; (3) determination of the correct dose to use in clinical trials; and (4) delineation of a clinical end point that is an accurate measure of the underlying disease and is not confounded by potential symptomatic effects of a study intervention. New developments in understanding the cause of the disease, in the development of animal models of PD, and in clinical trial methodology will hopefully hasten the resolution of these problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S101-S110
JournalAnnals of Neurology
Volume64
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why have we failed to achieve neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this