TY - JOUR
T1 - Wheat oral immunotherapy
AU - Leeds, Stephanie
AU - Liu, Elise G.
AU - Nowak-Wegrzyn, Anna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - Purpose of review The prevalence of food allergy is increasing on a global scale, and therefore increased attention is being paid to specific food allergy epidemiology and management. There has been a large amount of progress made in the last decade on human trials of wheat oral immunotherapy (WOIT). Recent findings To date, there has been one multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of WOIT, one randomized, noncontrolled trial of WOIT, and several smaller, nonrandomized clinical trials of WOIT. WOIT trials are generally limited by smaller sample sizes, affecting the demographic skew of evaluated patients. In addition, there is minimal standardization of efficacy and safety outcomes between trial protocols, making head-to-head comparison challenging. However, some common themes emerge. The majority of WOIT regimens result in successful desensitization, and success is more likely with higher maintenance dosing for longer periods of time. Limited studies have looked at sustained unresponsiveness in WOIT. WOIT can induce allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, but more severe reactions often have an associated augmenting factor, such as exercise. Lower maintenance doses likely are associated with less severe reactions, and food modification and/or adjunct therapeutics may also decrease the risk of reactions. Summary WOIT trials are ongoing and will optimize updosing protocols and maintenance doses to improve efficacy and safety.
AB - Purpose of review The prevalence of food allergy is increasing on a global scale, and therefore increased attention is being paid to specific food allergy epidemiology and management. There has been a large amount of progress made in the last decade on human trials of wheat oral immunotherapy (WOIT). Recent findings To date, there has been one multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of WOIT, one randomized, noncontrolled trial of WOIT, and several smaller, nonrandomized clinical trials of WOIT. WOIT trials are generally limited by smaller sample sizes, affecting the demographic skew of evaluated patients. In addition, there is minimal standardization of efficacy and safety outcomes between trial protocols, making head-to-head comparison challenging. However, some common themes emerge. The majority of WOIT regimens result in successful desensitization, and success is more likely with higher maintenance dosing for longer periods of time. Limited studies have looked at sustained unresponsiveness in WOIT. WOIT can induce allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, but more severe reactions often have an associated augmenting factor, such as exercise. Lower maintenance doses likely are associated with less severe reactions, and food modification and/or adjunct therapeutics may also decrease the risk of reactions. Summary WOIT trials are ongoing and will optimize updosing protocols and maintenance doses to improve efficacy and safety.
KW - allergy
KW - food
KW - gluten
KW - oral immunotherapy
KW - wheat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105761010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000743
DO - 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000743
M3 - Article
C2 - 33840798
AN - SCOPUS:85105761010
SN - 1528-4050
VL - 21
SP - 269
EP - 277
JO - Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 3
ER -