TY - JOUR
T1 - What about tocilizumab? A retrospective study from a NYC Hospital during the COVID- 19 outbreak
AU - Mehta, Monica
AU - Purpura, Lawrence J.
AU - McConville, Thomas H.
AU - Neidell, Matthew J.
AU - Anderson, Michaela R.
AU - Bernstein, Elana J.
AU - Dietz, Donald E.
AU - Laracy, Justin
AU - Gunaratne, Shauna H.
AU - Miller, Emily Happy
AU - Cheng, Jennifer
AU - Zucker, Jason
AU - Shah, Shivang S.
AU - Chaudhuri, Shaoli
AU - Gordillo, Christian A.
AU - Patel, Shreena R.
AU - Guo, Tai Wei
AU - Karaaslan, Lara E.
AU - Reshef, Ran
AU - Miko, Benjamin A.
AU - Bathon, Joan M.
AU - Pereira, Marcus R.
AU - Uhlemann, Anne Catrin
AU - Yin, Michael T.
AU - Sobieszczyk, Magdalena E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Mehta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor blocker, has been used in the inflammatory phase of COVID-19, but its impact independent of corticosteroids remains unclear in patients with severe disease. Methods In this retrospective analysis of patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 2 and April 14, 2020 to a large academic medical center in New York City, we describe outcomes associated with tocilizumab 400 mg (without methylprednisolone) compared to a propensitymatched control. The primary endpoints were change in a 7-point ordinal scale of oxygenation and ventilator free survival, both at days 14 and 28. Secondary endpoints include incidence of bacterial superinfections and gastrointestinal perforation. Primary outcomes were evaluated using t-test. Results We identified 33 patients who received tocilizumab and matched 74 controls based on demographics and health measures upon admission. After adjusting for illness severity and baseline ordinal scale, we failed to find evidence of an improvement in hypoxemia based on an ordinal scale at hospital day 14 in the tocilizumab group (OR 2.2; 95% CI, 0.7-6.5; p = 0.157) or day 28 (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-3.6; p = 0.82). There also was no evidence of an improvement in ventilator-free survival at day 14 (OR 0.8; 95% CI, 0.18-3.5; p = 0.75) or day 28 (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.1-1.8; p = 0.23). There was no increase in secondary bacterial infection rates in the tocilizumab group compared to controls (OR 0.37; 95% CI, 0.09-1.53; p = 0.168). Conclusions There was no evidence to support an improvement in hypoxemia or ventilator-free survival with use of tocilizumab 400 mg in the absence of corticosteroids. No increase in secondary bacterial infections was observed in the group receiving tocilizumab.
AB - Background Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor blocker, has been used in the inflammatory phase of COVID-19, but its impact independent of corticosteroids remains unclear in patients with severe disease. Methods In this retrospective analysis of patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 2 and April 14, 2020 to a large academic medical center in New York City, we describe outcomes associated with tocilizumab 400 mg (without methylprednisolone) compared to a propensitymatched control. The primary endpoints were change in a 7-point ordinal scale of oxygenation and ventilator free survival, both at days 14 and 28. Secondary endpoints include incidence of bacterial superinfections and gastrointestinal perforation. Primary outcomes were evaluated using t-test. Results We identified 33 patients who received tocilizumab and matched 74 controls based on demographics and health measures upon admission. After adjusting for illness severity and baseline ordinal scale, we failed to find evidence of an improvement in hypoxemia based on an ordinal scale at hospital day 14 in the tocilizumab group (OR 2.2; 95% CI, 0.7-6.5; p = 0.157) or day 28 (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-3.6; p = 0.82). There also was no evidence of an improvement in ventilator-free survival at day 14 (OR 0.8; 95% CI, 0.18-3.5; p = 0.75) or day 28 (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.1-1.8; p = 0.23). There was no increase in secondary bacterial infection rates in the tocilizumab group compared to controls (OR 0.37; 95% CI, 0.09-1.53; p = 0.168). Conclusions There was no evidence to support an improvement in hypoxemia or ventilator-free survival with use of tocilizumab 400 mg in the absence of corticosteroids. No increase in secondary bacterial infections was observed in the group receiving tocilizumab.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104124903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0249349
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0249349
M3 - Article
C2 - 33831046
AN - SCOPUS:85104124903
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 16
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 4 April
M1 - e0249349
ER -