TY - JOUR
T1 - Visualization of Real-Time Esophageal Location Using Intracardiac Echocardiography on a Three-Dimensional Mapping System
T2 - Comparison of Esophageal Location Using Preoperative Computed Tomography and Investigation of Predictors for Esophageal Movement During Catheter Ablation
AU - Sudo, Koji
AU - Kuroki, Kenji
AU - Asahina, Chisa
AU - Atsumi, Maoko
AU - Nakagawa, Kazuya
AU - Asakawa, Tetsuya
AU - Hasegawa, Tomoaki
AU - Aonuma, Kazutaka
AU - Sato, Akira
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation; however, esophageal-related complications remain a concern. The first objective of this study was to compare the feasibility of two techniques for visualizing real-time esophageal images: intracardiac echocardiography (ICE-Eso) and preoperative computed tomography (CT-Eso). The second objective was to clarify the predictors of esophageal movement on the day of catheter ablation. Methods and Results: Eighty consecutive patients were included in this study. The esophageal location was measured at the centerline of each image on three equally separated imaging sections (upper, middle, and lower sites). Esophageal locations detected on ICE-Eso and CT-Eso were compared with those on contrast esophagography. We also investigated predictors of esophageal movement. A significant difference was found between the two distances in all three sections: upper site (ICE-Eso: 2.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.4–3.6] mm vs. CT-Eso: 5.2 [IQR 3.4–7.6] mm, p < 0.001), middle site (ICE-Eso: 2.7 [IQR 1.3–4.3] mm vs. CT-Eso: 5.4 [IQR 3.2–8.3] mm, p < 0.001), and lower site (ICE-Eso: 2.8 [IQR 1.2–5.2] mm vs. CT-Eso: 5.8 [IQR 3.1–10.3] mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that eating a meal on the morning on the day of catheter ablation (non-fasting) was a predictor of esophageal movement. One patient (1.2%) experienced gastric hypomotility, which resolved completely with medical treatment. Conclusion: The results showed that ICE-Eso provided real-time, accurate esophageal location compared to CT-Eso. Therefore, ICE-Eso-guided PVI on the left atrial posterior wall near the esophagus may be a safe method. Additionally, non-fasting on the day of catheter ablation could help to predict esophageal movement.
AB - Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation; however, esophageal-related complications remain a concern. The first objective of this study was to compare the feasibility of two techniques for visualizing real-time esophageal images: intracardiac echocardiography (ICE-Eso) and preoperative computed tomography (CT-Eso). The second objective was to clarify the predictors of esophageal movement on the day of catheter ablation. Methods and Results: Eighty consecutive patients were included in this study. The esophageal location was measured at the centerline of each image on three equally separated imaging sections (upper, middle, and lower sites). Esophageal locations detected on ICE-Eso and CT-Eso were compared with those on contrast esophagography. We also investigated predictors of esophageal movement. A significant difference was found between the two distances in all three sections: upper site (ICE-Eso: 2.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.4–3.6] mm vs. CT-Eso: 5.2 [IQR 3.4–7.6] mm, p < 0.001), middle site (ICE-Eso: 2.7 [IQR 1.3–4.3] mm vs. CT-Eso: 5.4 [IQR 3.2–8.3] mm, p < 0.001), and lower site (ICE-Eso: 2.8 [IQR 1.2–5.2] mm vs. CT-Eso: 5.8 [IQR 3.1–10.3] mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that eating a meal on the morning on the day of catheter ablation (non-fasting) was a predictor of esophageal movement. One patient (1.2%) experienced gastric hypomotility, which resolved completely with medical treatment. Conclusion: The results showed that ICE-Eso provided real-time, accurate esophageal location compared to CT-Eso. Therefore, ICE-Eso-guided PVI on the left atrial posterior wall near the esophagus may be a safe method. Additionally, non-fasting on the day of catheter ablation could help to predict esophageal movement.
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - esophageal injury
KW - high-power short-duration ablation
KW - intracardiac echocardiography
KW - pulmonary vein isolation
KW - radiofrequency catheter ablation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016469707
U2 - 10.1111/jce.70096
DO - 10.1111/jce.70096
M3 - Article
C2 - 40970478
AN - SCOPUS:105016469707
SN - 1045-3873
VL - 36
SP - 3024
EP - 3032
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
IS - 11
ER -