TY - JOUR
T1 - Viral tricks to grid-lock the type I interferon system
AU - Versteeg, Gijs A.
AU - García-Sastre, Adolfo
N1 - Funding Information:
Research in the A.G.-S. laboratory is partly supported by NIH funding: R01 AI46954 , U54 AI57158 (North East Biodefense Center), U19AI83025 , U01AI070469 , U01AI074539 , P01AI058113 , P01AI082325 and by CRIP ( Center for Research on Influenza Pathogenesis , NIAID contract HHSN266200700010C).
PY - 2010/8
Y1 - 2010/8
N2 - Type I interferons (IFNs) play a crucial role in the innate immune avant-garde against viral infections. Virtually all viruses have developed means to counteract the induction, signaling, or antiviral actions of the IFN circuit. Over 170 different virus-encoded IFN antagonists from 93 distinct viruses have been described up to now, indicating that most viruses interfere with multiple stages of the IFN response. Although every viral IFN antagonist is unique in its own right, four main mechanisms are employed to circumvent innate immune responses: (i) general inhibition of cellular gene expression, (ii) sequestration of molecules in the IFN circuit, (iii) proteolytic cleavage, and (iv) proteasomal degradation of key components of the IFN system. The increasing understanding of how different viral IFN antagonists function has been translated to the generation of viruses with mutant IFN antagonists as potential live vaccine candidates. Moreover, IFN antagonists are attractive targets for inhibition by small-molecule compounds.
AB - Type I interferons (IFNs) play a crucial role in the innate immune avant-garde against viral infections. Virtually all viruses have developed means to counteract the induction, signaling, or antiviral actions of the IFN circuit. Over 170 different virus-encoded IFN antagonists from 93 distinct viruses have been described up to now, indicating that most viruses interfere with multiple stages of the IFN response. Although every viral IFN antagonist is unique in its own right, four main mechanisms are employed to circumvent innate immune responses: (i) general inhibition of cellular gene expression, (ii) sequestration of molecules in the IFN circuit, (iii) proteolytic cleavage, and (iv) proteasomal degradation of key components of the IFN system. The increasing understanding of how different viral IFN antagonists function has been translated to the generation of viruses with mutant IFN antagonists as potential live vaccine candidates. Moreover, IFN antagonists are attractive targets for inhibition by small-molecule compounds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955413296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.009
M3 - Review article
C2 - 20538505
AN - SCOPUS:77955413296
SN - 1369-5274
VL - 13
SP - 508
EP - 516
JO - Current Opinion in Microbiology
JF - Current Opinion in Microbiology
IS - 4
ER -