Abstract
Objectives The goal of this study was to assess the frequency and predictors of vascular closure device (VCD) deployment failure, and its association with vascular complications of 3 commonly used VCDs. Background VCDs are commonly used following percutaneous coronary intervention on the basis of studies demonstrating reduced time to ambulation, increased patient comfort, and possible reduction in vascular complications as compared with manual compression. However, limited data are available on the frequency and predictors of VCD failure, and the association of deployment failure with vascular complications. Methods From a de-identified dataset provided by Massachusetts Department of Health, 23,813 consecutive interventional coronary procedures that used either a collagen plugbased (n = 18,533), a nitinol clipbased (n = 2,284), or a suture-based (n = 2,996) VCD between June 2005 and December 2007 were identified. The authors defined VCD failure as unsuccessful deployment or failure to achieve immediate access site hemostasis. Results Among 23,813 procedures, the VCD failed in 781 (3.3%) procedures (2.1% of collagen plugbased, 6.1% of suture-based, 9.5% of nitinol clipbased VCDs). Patients with VCD failure had an excess risk of "any" (7.7% vs. 2.8%; p < 0.001), major (3.3% vs. 0.8%; p < 0.001), or minor (5.8% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.001) vascular complications compared with successful VCD deployment. In a propensity scoreadjusted analysis, when compared with collagen plugbased VCD (reference odds ratio [OR] = 1.0), nitinol clipbased VCD had 2-fold increased risk (OR: 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 2.3, p < 0.001) and suture-based VCD had 1.25-fold increased risk (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.3, p < 0.001) for VCD failure. Conclusions VCD failure was a significant predictor of subsequent vascular complications for both collagen plugbased VCD and nitinol clipbased VCD, but not for suture-based VCD. VCD failure rates vary depending upon the type of VCD used and are associated with significantly higher vascular complications as compared with deployment successes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 837-844 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Angio-Seal
- Perclose
- StarClose
- complications
- vascular closure device
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Vascular closure device failure in contemporary practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver