Validation of the surgical apgar score in a veteran population undergoing general surgery

Marcovalerio Melis, Antonio Pinna, Shunpei Okochi, Antonio Masi, Alan S. Rosman, Dena Neihaus, John K. Saunders, Elliot Newman, Thomas H. Gouge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS, a 10-point score calculated using limited intraoperative data) can correlate with postoperative morbidity and mortality after general surgery. We evaluated reliability of SAS in a veteran population. Study Design We prospectively collected demographics, medical history, type of surgery, and postoperative outcomes for any veteran undergoing general surgery at our institution (2006-2011). We categorized patients in 4 SAS groups and compared differences in morbidity and mortality. Results Our study population included 2,125 patients (SAS ≤4: n = 29; SAS 5-6: n = 227; SAS 7-8: n = 797; SAS 9-10: n = 1,072). Low-SAS patients were likely to have significant preoperative comorbidities and to undergo major surgery, and had increased postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality. Conclusions The SAS is easily calculated from 3 routinely available intraoperative measurements, correlates with fixed preoperative risk (acute conditions, pre-existing comorbidities, operative complexity), and effectively identifies veterans at high risk for postoperative complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-225
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume218
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the surgical apgar score in a veteran population undergoing general surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this