TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the Iwate scoring system for the stratification of laparoscopic liver resections
T2 - An international multicenter study
AU - International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators
AU - Peng, Yufu
AU - Liu, Fei
AU - Li, Bo
AU - Wei, Yonggang
AU - Tan, Hwee Leong
AU - Syn, Nicholas L.
AU - Fuks, David
AU - Soubrane, Olivier
AU - Dokmak, Safi
AU - Gruttadauria, Salvatore
AU - Zimmitti, Giuseppe
AU - Jaber, Bashar
AU - Cipriani, Federica
AU - Kato, Yutaro
AU - Scatton, Olivier
AU - Herman, Paulo
AU - Aghayan, Davit L.
AU - Marino, Marco V.
AU - Croner, Roland S.
AU - Mazzaferro, Vincenzo
AU - Chiow, Adrian K.H.
AU - Sucandy, Iswanto
AU - Ivanecz, Arpad
AU - Choi, Sung Hoon
AU - Lee, Jae Hoon
AU - Prieto, Mikel
AU - Vivarelli, Marco
AU - Giuliante, Felice
AU - Ruzzenente, Andrea
AU - Yong, Chee Chien
AU - Yin, Mengqiu
AU - Fondevila, Constantino
AU - Efanov, Mikhail
AU - Morise, Zenichi
AU - Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
AU - Brustia, Raffaele
AU - Dalla Valle, Raffaele
AU - Boggi, Ugo
AU - Geller, David
AU - Belli, Andrea
AU - Memeo, Riccardo
AU - Mejia, Alejandro
AU - Park, James O.
AU - Rotellar, Fernando
AU - Choi, Gi Hong
AU - Robles-Campos, Ricardo
AU - Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
AU - Wang, Xiaoying
AU - Sutcliffe, Robert P.
AU - Pratschke, Johann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Introduction: The Iwate difficulty scoring system (DSS) is one of the most widely validated DSS for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). However, these studies only validated the 4 difficulty levels and did not validate the 12-point difficulty index of the system. To address current limitations in the studies validating the Iwate difficulty scoring system (DSS), we performed an international multicenter study to validate the Iwate DSS across both its four difficulty levels and 12-point difficulty index. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 22,252 patients undergoing LLR across 64 centers worldwide between 2005 and 2021 was performed. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the four difficulty levels and 12-point difficulty index of the Iwate DSS. Results: A total of 14,759 patients met the inclusion criteria. The main indications for LLR were hepatocellular carcinoma/intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (52.8 %), and metastatic tumors liver (26.5 %). In terms of underlying liver pathology, 5127 patients (34.8 %) had liver cirrhosis, and 1214 patients (8.3 %) had portal hypertension. Intraoperative outcomes (operation time, blood loss, blood transfusion, use of Pringles maneuver and open conversion) and postoperative outcomes (length of stay, morbidity, major complications, and 90-day mortality) significantly increased with stepwise increases across the four difficulty levels (P < 0.001) and 12-point difficulty index (P < 0.001). These trends remained significant following adjustment for baseline characteristics (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Iwate DSS 12-point difficulty index and four difficulty levels correlated well with LLR difficulty as determined by key surrogate perioperative measures.
AB - Introduction: The Iwate difficulty scoring system (DSS) is one of the most widely validated DSS for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). However, these studies only validated the 4 difficulty levels and did not validate the 12-point difficulty index of the system. To address current limitations in the studies validating the Iwate difficulty scoring system (DSS), we performed an international multicenter study to validate the Iwate DSS across both its four difficulty levels and 12-point difficulty index. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 22,252 patients undergoing LLR across 64 centers worldwide between 2005 and 2021 was performed. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the four difficulty levels and 12-point difficulty index of the Iwate DSS. Results: A total of 14,759 patients met the inclusion criteria. The main indications for LLR were hepatocellular carcinoma/intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (52.8 %), and metastatic tumors liver (26.5 %). In terms of underlying liver pathology, 5127 patients (34.8 %) had liver cirrhosis, and 1214 patients (8.3 %) had portal hypertension. Intraoperative outcomes (operation time, blood loss, blood transfusion, use of Pringles maneuver and open conversion) and postoperative outcomes (length of stay, morbidity, major complications, and 90-day mortality) significantly increased with stepwise increases across the four difficulty levels (P < 0.001) and 12-point difficulty index (P < 0.001). These trends remained significant following adjustment for baseline characteristics (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Iwate DSS 12-point difficulty index and four difficulty levels correlated well with LLR difficulty as determined by key surrogate perioperative measures.
KW - Difficulty score
KW - Iwate criteria
KW - Laparoscopic liver resection
KW - Perioperative outcomes
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001223875&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109597
DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109597
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001223875
SN - 0748-7983
VL - 51
JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 6
M1 - 109597
ER -