Abstract
Objective: To compare the performance of two previously reported logistic regression models using data independent from those data used to derive the models. Design: Prospective. Setting: Acute stroke unit of a tertiary care hospital. Patients: One hundred twenty-nine patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Measurements and Main Results: Model 1 contains the initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, hemorrhage size, and pulse pressure. The more complex model 2 includes, in addition to those three variables, the presence or absence of intraventricular hemorrhage and a term representing the interaction of intraventricular hemorrhage and Glasgow Coma Scale score. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves generated for each model were statistically indistinguishable. Conclusions: Model 1 predicts 30-day patient status as well as the more complex model 2. Model i provides a valid, easy-to-use means of categorizing supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage patients in terms of their probability of survival.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 950-954 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Critical Care Medicine |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1995 |
Keywords
- critical illness
- hemorrhage, intracerebral
- logistic regression
- neurologic emergencies
- outcomes research
- patient outcome assessment
- prognosis
- stroke
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Validation and comparison of models predicting survival following intracerebral hemorrhage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver