Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation and comparison of models predicting survival following intracerebral hemorrhage

  • S. Tuhrim
  • , D. R. Horowitz
  • , M. Sacher
  • , J. H. Godbold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

140 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the performance of two previously reported logistic regression models using data independent from those data used to derive the models. Design: Prospective. Setting: Acute stroke unit of a tertiary care hospital. Patients: One hundred twenty-nine patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Measurements and Main Results: Model 1 contains the initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, hemorrhage size, and pulse pressure. The more complex model 2 includes, in addition to those three variables, the presence or absence of intraventricular hemorrhage and a term representing the interaction of intraventricular hemorrhage and Glasgow Coma Scale score. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves generated for each model were statistically indistinguishable. Conclusions: Model 1 predicts 30-day patient status as well as the more complex model 2. Model i provides a valid, easy-to-use means of categorizing supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage patients in terms of their probability of survival.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)950-954
Number of pages5
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Keywords

  • critical illness
  • hemorrhage, intracerebral
  • logistic regression
  • neurologic emergencies
  • outcomes research
  • patient outcome assessment
  • prognosis
  • stroke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation and comparison of models predicting survival following intracerebral hemorrhage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this