Validating the Hierarchical Nature of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification System

Rajkishen Narayanan, Jonathan Dalton, Richard Bransford, Marcel R. Dvorak, Harvinder Singh Chhabra, Andrei F. Joaquim, Mohammad El-Sharkawi, Lorin M. Benneker, Klaus Schnake, Cumhur Oner, Charlotte Dandurand, Jose A. Canseco, Christopher K. Kepler, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Gregory D. Schroeder, Aayush Aryal, Abner Bissoli, Héctor Aceituno, Alhammoud Abduljabbar, Nur Aida Faruk SenanAlessandro Ramieri, Alon Grundshtein, Alor Nnaemeka, Alvin Pun, Amanda O'Halloran, Amauri Godinho, Amin Henine, Andreas K. Demetriades, Andreas Morakis, Axel Partenheimer, Bernhard W. Ullrich, Yi Ting Liu, Claudio Bernucci, Björn Giera, Carsten Raab, Christian W. Müller, Subramaniam Mac Herla Haribabu, Eugen Cezar Popescu, Daniel Ochieng, Dan Schneider, Darko Perovic, Derek T. Cawley, Devi Prakash Tokala, Andrea Redaelli, Koroush Kabir, Loya Vijay Kumar, Govind Gurumoorthy Prabakaran, Subbiah Jayakumar, Vishal Kumar, Tripathi Manjul, Óscar Enrique Ramirez, Wael Alsammak, Sathish Muthu, Vishwajeet Singh, Anas Dyab, Eduardo Laos, Ehab Shiban, Emiliano Vialle, Federico Sartor, Felipe Santos, Fernando Gonzalez, Fernando Melo Filho, Francisco Verdu-Lopez, Furuya Takeo, Fernando Krywinski, Georg Osterhoff, Giorgio Lofrese, Omar Marroquin, Himanshu Shekhar, Christian Staedt Hohaus, Ivan Marintschev, Joost Rutges, Aithala P. Janardhana, Jeronimo Milano, Joachim Vahl, John Afolayan, M. Jorge Uribe, Ignacio Paleo, Joseph F. Baker, John P. Kleimeyer, Jin Tee, Juan Muñoz, Juan Lourido, Ariel Kaen, Khoh Phaik Shan, Konstantinos Margetis, Konstantinos Paterakis, Lady Lozano Cari, Ahmed Fouad Dawoud, Louis Carius, Luis María Romero-Muñoz, Matias Pereira Duarte, Máximo Alberto Diez-Ulloa, Mario Ganau, Tejeda Martin, Matti Scholz, Mauro Pluderi, Miltiadis Georgiopoulos, Michal Ziga, Luis Duchén, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Nicola Montemurro, Naresh Kumar, Rajesh Bahadur Lakhey, Nicolas Lauper, Nimrod Rahamimov, Oliver Riesenbeck, Oke Obadaseraye, Ahmed Abouelhamd, Osmar Moraes, Peter Loughenbury, Parmenion P. Tsitsopoulos, Payman Vahedi, Pedro Bazán, Paulo Pereira, Philippe Bancel, Kamalanathan Palaniandy, Pragnesh Bhatt, Rakan Farouk Y. Bokhari, Rian Souza Vieira, Mohammed Riaz, Richard Menger, Rafael Llombart-Blanco, R. S. Chahal, Ratko Yurac, Samarth Mittal, Welege Wimalachandra, Sandra Hobson, Brian Saway, Sarvdeep Dhatt, Sebastian F. Bigdon, Selim Ayhan, Sergey Mlyavykh, Shaffaf Kareem, Shay Mandler, Slavisa Zagorac, Norah Foster, Zhi Wang, Jun Zhang, Stavridis Stavros I, Stefano Carnesecchi, Stipe Corluka, Sokol Trungu, Takeshi Aoyama, Ron Tamy, Tommi Korhonen, Triantafyllos Bouras, Adetunji Toluse, Wiktor Urbanski, Uri Hadesberg, Petr Vachata, Vishal Borse, Vafa Rahimi Movaghar, Waeel Hamouda, Nanfang Xu, Yasunori Sorimachi, Yuki Fujioka, Zacharia Silk, Gerardo F. Zambito-Brondo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Study Design. Global cross-sectional survey. Objective. To validate the hierarchical nature of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification (UCIC) across AO geographical regions/practice experience. Summary of Background Data. In order to create a universally validated scheme with prognostic value, AO Spine established an upper cervical spine injury classification involving three elements: injury morphology (region: I - occipital condyle and craniocervical junction; II - C1 ring and C1-2 joint; III - C2 and C2-3 joint), and (subtype: A - isolated bony injury; B - bony/ligamentous injury; C - displaced/translational injury), neurologic status (N0 - intact; N1 - transient deficit; N2 - radiculopathy; N3 - incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI); N4 - complete SCI, and NX - unable to examine), and case-specific modifiers (M1 - injuries at risk of nonunion; M2 - injuries at risk of instability; M3 - patient specific factors; M4 - vascular injury). Methods. 151 AO Spine members (orthopaedic and neurosurgery) were surveyed globally regarding the severity (zero - low severity to 100 - high severity) of each UCIC variable. Primary outcomes were differences in perceived injury severity score (ISS) over various geographic/practice settings, level of experience, and subspecialty. Results. 148 responses were received. There was an increase in median perceived severity as each anatomic region (I-III) progressed from types A to B to C. Neurologic status progressed similarly, except N1 and N2 were perceived similarly. Modifier M2 was perceived more severely than M3. There were no differences in ISS amongst levels of surgeon experience. There were small geographic differences with respondents from North and Central and South America perceiving types IC (P=0.003), IIB (P=0.003), and IIIB (P=0.003) somewhat more severely than other regions. Neurosurgeons perceived types IB (P=0.002) and IIIB (P=0.026) as more severe than orthopaedic spine surgeons. Conclusions. The AO Spine UCIC has overall excellent hierarchical progression in subtype ISS. These findings are consistent across geographic regions, spine subspecialty training and experience levels.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10.1097/BRS.0000000000005297
JournalSpine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • AO spine
  • global
  • hierarchical
  • injury severity score
  • upper cervical spine injury classification
  • validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validating the Hierarchical Nature of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this