Vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery for arrest of descent*

Nathan S. Fox, Amalia G. Namath, Munira Ali, Mariam Naqvi, Simi Gupta, Andrei Rebarber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) success rates for patients with a prior cesarean delivery (CD) for arrest of descent, as well as determine any predictors for success. Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients delivered by a single MFM practice from 2005 to 2017 with a singleton pregnancy and one prior CD for arrest of descent. We estimated the rate and associated risk factors for successful VBAC. Results: We included 208 patients with one prior CD for arrest of descent, 100 (48.1%) of whom attempted a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) with a VBAC success rate was 84/100 (84%, 95% CI 76–90%). Among the women who attempted TOLAC, women with a prior vaginal delivery >24 weeks’ had a significantly higher VBAC success rate (91.8% versus 71.8%, p =.01). Maternal age, body mass index, estimated fetal weight, induction of labor, and cervical dilation were not associated with a higher VBAC success rate. Conclusions: For women with a prior CD for arrest of descent, VBAC success rates are high. This suggests that arrest of descent is mostly dependent on factors unique to each pregnancy and not due to an inadequate pelvis or recurring conditions. Women with a prior CD for arrest of descent should not be discouraged from attempting TOLAC in a subsequent pregnancy due to concerns about the likelihood of success.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2638-2642
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume32
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - 18 Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Arrest of descent
  • success
  • vaginal birth after cesarean

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery for arrest of descent*'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this