TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilizing ChatGPT to Facilitate Referrals for Fetal Echocardiography
AU - Gordin Kopylov, Lital
AU - Goldrat, Itai
AU - Maymon, Ron
AU - Svirsky, Ran
AU - Wiener, Yifat
AU - Klang, Eyal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - INTRODUCTION: OpenAI's GPT-4 (artificial intelligence [AI]) is being studied for its use as a medical decision support tool. This research examines its accuracy in refining referrals for fetal echocardiography (FE) to improve early detection and outcomes related to congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHODS: Past FE data referred to our institution were evaluated separately by pediatric cardiologist, gynecologist (human experts [experts]), and AI, according to established guidelines. We compared experts and AI's agreement on referral necessity, with experts addressing discrepancies. RESULTS: Total of 59 FE cases were addressed retrospectively. Cardiologist, gynecologist, and AI recommended performing FE in 47.5%, 49.2%, and 59.0% of cases, respectively. Comparing AI recommendations to experts indicated agreement of around 80.0% with both experts (p < 0.001). Notably, AI suggested more echocardiographies for minor CHD (64.7%) compared to experts (47.1%), and for major CHD, experts recommended performing FE in all cases (100%) while AI recommended in majority of cases (90.9%). Discrepancies between AI and experts are detailed and reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation found moderate agreement between AI and experts. Contextual misunderstandings and lack of specialized medical knowledge limit AI, necessitating clinical guideline guidance. Despite shortcomings, AI's referrals comprised 65% of minor CHD cases versus experts 47%, suggesting its potential as a cautious decision aid for clinicians.
AB - INTRODUCTION: OpenAI's GPT-4 (artificial intelligence [AI]) is being studied for its use as a medical decision support tool. This research examines its accuracy in refining referrals for fetal echocardiography (FE) to improve early detection and outcomes related to congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHODS: Past FE data referred to our institution were evaluated separately by pediatric cardiologist, gynecologist (human experts [experts]), and AI, according to established guidelines. We compared experts and AI's agreement on referral necessity, with experts addressing discrepancies. RESULTS: Total of 59 FE cases were addressed retrospectively. Cardiologist, gynecologist, and AI recommended performing FE in 47.5%, 49.2%, and 59.0% of cases, respectively. Comparing AI recommendations to experts indicated agreement of around 80.0% with both experts (p < 0.001). Notably, AI suggested more echocardiographies for minor CHD (64.7%) compared to experts (47.1%), and for major CHD, experts recommended performing FE in all cases (100%) while AI recommended in majority of cases (90.9%). Discrepancies between AI and experts are detailed and reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation found moderate agreement between AI and experts. Contextual misunderstandings and lack of specialized medical knowledge limit AI, necessitating clinical guideline guidance. Despite shortcomings, AI's referrals comprised 65% of minor CHD cases versus experts 47%, suggesting its potential as a cautious decision aid for clinicians.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Fetal cardiology
KW - Fetal echocardiography
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85205038447
U2 - 10.1159/000539658
DO - 10.1159/000539658
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 38834046
AN - SCOPUS:85205038447
SN - 1015-3837
VL - 51
SP - 474
EP - 477
JO - Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
JF - Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
IS - 5
ER -