TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilization of peritoneal dialysis in the United States
T2 - Reasons for underutilization, specifically in New York State and the boroughs of New York City
AU - Yap, Ernie
AU - Joseph, Marcia
AU - Sharma, Shuchita
AU - El Shamy, Osama
AU - Weinberg, Alan D.
AU - Delano, Barbara G.
AU - Uribarri, Jaime
AU - Saggi, Subodh J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is currently underutilized in the United States (US), even within resource-rich neighborhoods. We analyzed data from US Renal Data Service to determine PD utilization within the US, New York State (NYS), selected boroughs within New York City (NYC), and Boston, Massachusetts. We then compared the odds of selecting PD with hemodialysis (HD) and analyzed how diabetes mellitus status, age >65 years, gender, and race influenced PD utilization between 2010 and 2016. We then compared a high-volume PD center (HVC) with a low-volume PD center (LVC). The odds of starting PD vs HD were as follows: Brooklyn 0.30 (0.25-0.36; <0.0001), Bronx 0.56 (0.47-0.67; <0.0001), Queens 0.66 (0.54-0.80; <0.0001), and Manhattan 0.61 (0.52-0.71; <0.0001). In 2016, the odds of starting PD compared with the rest of the US were as follows: Brooklyn 0.14 (0.08-0.22; <0.0001), Bronx 0.39 (0.27-0.56; <0.0001), Queens 0.32 (0.23-0.45; <0.0001), Manhattan 0.54 (0.36-0.79; 0.002), and Boston 0.89 (0.58-1.4; 0.624). Analysis of influencing factors showed that only age >65 significantly (<0.0001) influenced PD modality selection in Brooklyn and Boston. Differences between HVC and LVC in terms of modality transition, peritonitis rate, or provider:patient ratio were not statistically significant. Factors that influence PD utilization in urban neighborhoods are discussed and remediation measures are proposed.
AB - Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is currently underutilized in the United States (US), even within resource-rich neighborhoods. We analyzed data from US Renal Data Service to determine PD utilization within the US, New York State (NYS), selected boroughs within New York City (NYC), and Boston, Massachusetts. We then compared the odds of selecting PD with hemodialysis (HD) and analyzed how diabetes mellitus status, age >65 years, gender, and race influenced PD utilization between 2010 and 2016. We then compared a high-volume PD center (HVC) with a low-volume PD center (LVC). The odds of starting PD vs HD were as follows: Brooklyn 0.30 (0.25-0.36; <0.0001), Bronx 0.56 (0.47-0.67; <0.0001), Queens 0.66 (0.54-0.80; <0.0001), and Manhattan 0.61 (0.52-0.71; <0.0001). In 2016, the odds of starting PD compared with the rest of the US were as follows: Brooklyn 0.14 (0.08-0.22; <0.0001), Bronx 0.39 (0.27-0.56; <0.0001), Queens 0.32 (0.23-0.45; <0.0001), Manhattan 0.54 (0.36-0.79; 0.002), and Boston 0.89 (0.58-1.4; 0.624). Analysis of influencing factors showed that only age >65 significantly (<0.0001) influenced PD modality selection in Brooklyn and Boston. Differences between HVC and LVC in terms of modality transition, peritonitis rate, or provider:patient ratio were not statistically significant. Factors that influence PD utilization in urban neighborhoods are discussed and remediation measures are proposed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081905482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/sdi.12868
DO - 10.1111/sdi.12868
M3 - Article
C2 - 32160353
AN - SCOPUS:85081905482
SN - 0894-0959
VL - 33
SP - 140
EP - 147
JO - Seminars in Dialysis
JF - Seminars in Dialysis
IS - 2
ER -