Abstract
Our video-EEG monitoring (VEEG) unit is part of a typical metropolitan tertiary care center that services a diverse patient population. We aimed to determine if the specific clinical reason for inpatient VEEG was actually resolved. Our method was to retrospectively determine the stated goal of inpatient VEEG and to analyze the outcome of one hundred consecutive adult patients admitted for VEEG. The reason for admission fit into one of four categories: 1) to characterize paroxysmal events as either epileptic or nonepileptic, 2) to localize epileptic foci, 3) to characterize the epilepsy syndrome, and 4) to attempt safe antiepileptic drug adjustment. We found that VEEG was successful in accomplishing the goal of admission in 77% of cases. The remaining 23% failed primarily due to lack of typical events during monitoring. Furthermore, of the overall study cohort, VEEG outcomes altered medical management in 53% and surgery was pursued in 5%.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 501-503 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Epilepsy and Behavior |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Epilepsy center
- Epilepsy characterization
- Epilepsy localization
- Question for admission
- Retrospective study
- Tertiary care center
- Utility of video-EEG
- Video-EEG and medications
- Video-EEG and surgery
- Video-EEG monitoring
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Utility of video-EEG monitoring in a tertiary care epilepsy center'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver