Using web-based discussion forums as a model of the peer-review process and a tool for assessment

Sherry L. Jenkins; Ravi Iyengar; Maria A. Diverse-Pierluissi; Andrew M. Chan; Lakshmi A. Devi; Eric A. Sobie; Adrian T. Ting; Daniel C. Weinstein

doi:10.1126/stke.19tr2

Using web-based discussion forums as a model of the peer-review process and a tool for assessment

Sherry L. Jenkins
, Ravi Iyengar
, Maria A. Diverse-Pierluissi
, Andrew M. Chan
, Lakshmi A. Devi
, Eric A. Sobie
, Adrian T. Ting
, Daniel C. Weinstein

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This Teaching Resource describes how to use an online asynchronous discussion as a mechanism to introduce students to the peer-review process, as well as to assess student performance and understanding. This method was applied to a graduate course on signal transduction and the Teaching Resource includes a syllabus, detailed plan for incorporating the online discussion, sample journal club questions, and sample student responses to the discussion forum, faculty responses, and student revisions.

Original language	English
Article number	19tr2
Journal	Science Signaling
Volume	1
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.19tr2
State	Published - 4 Mar 2008

Access to Document

10.1126/stke.19tr2

Cite this

@article{852e4ed12ceb40fab7a704fabaae52ca,

title = "Using web-based discussion forums as a model of the peer-review process and a tool for assessment",

abstract = "This Teaching Resource describes how to use an online asynchronous discussion as a mechanism to introduce students to the peer-review process, as well as to assess student performance and understanding. This method was applied to a graduate course on signal transduction and the Teaching Resource includes a syllabus, detailed plan for incorporating the online discussion, sample journal club questions, and sample student responses to the discussion forum, faculty responses, and student revisions.",

author = "Jenkins, \{Sherry L.\} and Ravi Iyengar and Diverse-Pierluissi, \{Maria A.\} and Chan, \{Andrew M.\} and Devi, \{Lakshmi A.\} and Sobie, \{Eric A.\} and Ting, \{Adrian T.\} and Weinstein, \{Daniel C.\}",

year = "2008",

month = mar,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1126/stke.19tr2",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

journal = "Science Signaling",

issn = "1945-0877",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using web-based discussion forums as a model of the peer-review process and a tool for assessment

AU - Jenkins, Sherry L.

AU - Iyengar, Ravi

AU - Diverse-Pierluissi, Maria A.

AU - Chan, Andrew M.

AU - Devi, Lakshmi A.

AU - Sobie, Eric A.

AU - Ting, Adrian T.

AU - Weinstein, Daniel C.

PY - 2008/3/4

Y1 - 2008/3/4

N2 - This Teaching Resource describes how to use an online asynchronous discussion as a mechanism to introduce students to the peer-review process, as well as to assess student performance and understanding. This method was applied to a graduate course on signal transduction and the Teaching Resource includes a syllabus, detailed plan for incorporating the online discussion, sample journal club questions, and sample student responses to the discussion forum, faculty responses, and student revisions.

AB - This Teaching Resource describes how to use an online asynchronous discussion as a mechanism to introduce students to the peer-review process, as well as to assess student performance and understanding. This method was applied to a graduate course on signal transduction and the Teaching Resource includes a syllabus, detailed plan for incorporating the online discussion, sample journal club questions, and sample student responses to the discussion forum, faculty responses, and student revisions.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84890052330

U2 - 10.1126/stke.19tr2

DO - 10.1126/stke.19tr2

M3 - Article

C2 - 18323015

AN - SCOPUS:84890052330

SN - 1945-0877

VL - 1

JO - Science Signaling

JF - Science Signaling

IS - 9

M1 - 19tr2

ER -

Using web-based discussion forums as a model of the peer-review process and a tool for assessment

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this