Using computerized spiral analysis to evaluate deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson disease

  • Sara Radmard
  • , Roberto A. Ortega
  • , Blair Ford
  • , Nora Vanegas-Arroyave
  • , Guy M. McKhann
  • , Sameer A. Sheth
  • , Linda Winfield
  • , Marta San Luciano
  • , Rachel Saunders-Pullman
  • , Seth L. Pullman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether spiral analysis can monitor the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson disease (PD) and provide a window on clinical features that change post-operatively. Clinical evaluation after DBS is subjective and insensitive to small changes. Spiral analysis is a computerized test that quantifies kinematic, dynamic, and spatial aspects of spiral drawing. Validated computational indices are generated and correlate with a range of clinically relevant motor findings. These include measures of overall clinical severity (Severity), bradykinesia and rigidity (Smoothness), amount of tremor (Tremor), irregularity of drawing movements (Variability), and micrographia (Tightness). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the effect of subthalamic nucleus (STN) (n = 66) and ventral intermediate thalamus (Vim) (n = 10) DBS on spiral drawing in PD subjects using spiral analysis. Subjects freely drew ten spirals on plain paper with an inking pen on a graphics tablet. Five spiral indices (Severity, Smoothness, Tremor, Variability, Tightness) were calculated and compared pre- and post-operatively using Wilcoxon-rank sum tests, adjusting for multiple comparisons. Results: Severity improved after STN and Vim DBS (p < 0.005). Smoothness (p < 0.01) and Tremor (p < 0.02) both improved after STN and Vim DBS. Variability improved only with Vim DBS. Neither STN nor Vim DBS significantly changed Tightness. Conclusions: All major spiral indices, except Tightness, improved after DBS. This suggests spiral analysis monitors DBS effects in PD and provides an objective window on relevant clinical features that change post-operatively. It may thus have utilization in clinical trials or investigations into the neural pathways altered by DBS. The lack of change in Tightness supports the notion that DBS does not improve micrographia.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106878
JournalClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume208
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Objective motor measures
  • Parkinson disease
  • Spiral analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using computerized spiral analysis to evaluate deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this