Use of phantom studies to compare the performance of 8 different attenuation correction devices.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	107-108
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume	10
Issue number	1
State	Published - Jan 2003

Cite this

@article{9d9a1959f878407a82a0979b46d3abd3,

title = "Use of phantom studies to compare the performance of 8 different attenuation correction devices.",

author = "Garcia, \{Ernest V.\} and Hendel, \{Robert C.\} and Cullom, \{S. James\} and DePuey, \{E. Gordon\} and Bateman, \{Timothy M.\}",

year = "2003",

month = jan,

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "107--108",

journal = "Journal of Nuclear Cardiology",

issn = "1071-3581",

publisher = "American Society of Nuclear Cardiology",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of phantom studies to compare the performance of 8 different attenuation correction devices.

AU - Garcia, Ernest V.

AU - Hendel, Robert C.

AU - Cullom, S. James

AU - DePuey, E. Gordon

AU - Bateman, Timothy M.

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0042266895

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 12569341

AN - SCOPUS:0042266895

SN - 1071-3581

VL - 10

SP - 107

EP - 108

JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

IS - 1

ER -