US Prescription trends of antihistamines for atopic dermatitis, 2011-2016

Swati Garg; Jeffrey Zhao; Kyle Tegtmeyer; Parth Shah; Peter A. Lio

doi:10.1111/pde.14445

US Prescription trends of antihistamines for atopic dermatitis, 2011-2016

Swati Garg, Jeffrey Zhao, Kyle Tegtmeyer, Parth Shah, Peter A. Lio

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Antihistamine use for primary treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) is not recommended, but current guidelines state that sedating antihistamines are favored over non-sedating antihistamines for relief of burdensome pruritus. We analyzed the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data to compare use of antihistamines between dermatologists and non-dermatologists. Overall, dermatologists are more likely to prescribe sedating than non-sedating antihistamines when compared to non-dermatologists (P <.001, δ_abs = 0.45). Patients under 21 years old (P =.03, δ_abs = 0.10) and Black patients (P <.001, δ_abs = 0.19) were also more likely to receive sedating antihistamines than non-sedating antihistamines. These findings highlight the differential prescribing practices for atopic dermatitis among physicians.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	324-326
Number of pages	3
Journal	Pediatric Dermatology
Volume	38
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.14445
State	Published - 1 Jan 2021
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

AAD
NAMCS
antihistamine
atopic dermatitis

Access to Document

10.1111/pde.14445

Cite this

@article{251e057e83ad48c1b7466bb73da52e2f,

title = "US Prescription trends of antihistamines for atopic dermatitis, 2011-2016",

abstract = "Antihistamine use for primary treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) is not recommended, but current guidelines state that sedating antihistamines are favored over non-sedating antihistamines for relief of burdensome pruritus. We analyzed the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data to compare use of antihistamines between dermatologists and non-dermatologists. Overall, dermatologists are more likely to prescribe sedating than non-sedating antihistamines when compared to non-dermatologists (P <.001, δabs = 0.45). Patients under 21 years old (P =.03, δabs = 0.10) and Black patients (P <.001, δabs = 0.19) were also more likely to receive sedating antihistamines than non-sedating antihistamines. These findings highlight the differential prescribing practices for atopic dermatitis among physicians.",

keywords = "AAD, NAMCS, antihistamine, atopic dermatitis",

author = "Swati Garg and Jeffrey Zhao and Kyle Tegtmeyer and Parth Shah and Lio, {Peter A.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/pde.14445",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "324--326",

journal = "Pediatric Dermatology",

issn = "0736-8046",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - US Prescription trends of antihistamines for atopic dermatitis, 2011-2016

AU - Garg, Swati

AU - Zhao, Jeffrey

AU - Tegtmeyer, Kyle

AU - Shah, Parth

AU - Lio, Peter A.

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - Antihistamine use for primary treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) is not recommended, but current guidelines state that sedating antihistamines are favored over non-sedating antihistamines for relief of burdensome pruritus. We analyzed the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data to compare use of antihistamines between dermatologists and non-dermatologists. Overall, dermatologists are more likely to prescribe sedating than non-sedating antihistamines when compared to non-dermatologists (P <.001, δabs = 0.45). Patients under 21 years old (P =.03, δabs = 0.10) and Black patients (P <.001, δabs = 0.19) were also more likely to receive sedating antihistamines than non-sedating antihistamines. These findings highlight the differential prescribing practices for atopic dermatitis among physicians.

AB - Antihistamine use for primary treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) is not recommended, but current guidelines state that sedating antihistamines are favored over non-sedating antihistamines for relief of burdensome pruritus. We analyzed the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data to compare use of antihistamines between dermatologists and non-dermatologists. Overall, dermatologists are more likely to prescribe sedating than non-sedating antihistamines when compared to non-dermatologists (P <.001, δabs = 0.45). Patients under 21 years old (P =.03, δabs = 0.10) and Black patients (P <.001, δabs = 0.19) were also more likely to receive sedating antihistamines than non-sedating antihistamines. These findings highlight the differential prescribing practices for atopic dermatitis among physicians.

KW - AAD

KW - NAMCS

KW - antihistamine

KW - atopic dermatitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096862911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pde.14445

DO - 10.1111/pde.14445

M3 - Article

C2 - 33247474

AN - SCOPUS:85096862911

SN - 0736-8046

VL - 38

SP - 324

EP - 326

JO - Pediatric Dermatology

JF - Pediatric Dermatology

IS - 1

ER -

US Prescription trends of antihistamines for atopic dermatitis, 2011-2016

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this