Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data

Norbert Gleicher, Andrea Weghofer, David Barad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: In follow-up to an earlier study of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in Europe and the U.S. for the year 2001, the present study reports on 2002 outcomes in an attempt to determine diverging practice trends. Design: Retrospective cohort comparisons. Setting: Academically affiliated private fertility center. Patient(s): This study involved overall 324,238 IVF cycles in Europe and 115,538 cycles in the U.S. Main Outcome Measure(s): Pregnancy and delivery rates for fresh IVF cycles, frozen-thawed cycles, and oocyte donation cycles. Result(s): This study confirms continuing pregnancy outcome differences in all aspects of assisted reproduction to the benefit of the U.S., a much higher use of IVF procedures in Europe, and larger embryo transfer numbers and multiple pregnancy rates in the U.S., although both continents demonstrate an almost identical trend toward fewer embryos and lower multiple pregnancy rates. Conclusion(s): Universally lower pregnancy rates in Europe remain of concern, especially because the trend between 2001 and 2002 suggests a possible further widening of the gap. Initiatives that may further reduce European pregnancy rates, such as increasing emphasis on single-embryo transfers and legislative interventions, should therefore be introduced with caution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1301-1305
Number of pages5
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume87
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • In vitro fertilization (IVF)
  • assisted reproductive technologies (ART)
  • cost effectiveness
  • multiple births
  • oocyte donation
  • utilization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this