TY - JOUR
T1 - Unsuspected preexisting saphenous vein disease
T2 - an unrecognized cause of vein bypass failure
AU - Panetta, Thomas F.
AU - Marin, Michael L.
AU - Veith, Frank J.
AU - Goldsmith, Jamie
AU - Gordon, Ronald E.
AU - Jones, Anne M.
AU - Schwartz, Michael L.
AU - Gupta, Sushil K.
AU - Wengerter, Kurt R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by the James Hilton Manning and Emma Austin Manning Foundation, The Anna S. Brown Trust, and The New York Institute for Vascular Studies.
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Our prior anecdotal experience with unsuspected preexisting saphenous vein disease prompted us to study its incidence, its relation to graft failure, and to identify techniques for its detection. Thick-walled, postphlebitic sclerotic occluded, postphlebitic sclerotic recanalized, calcified, and varicose vein lesions were detected in 63 (12%) of 513 infrainguinal vein bypasses. In 13 (2% to 5%) cases, severe saphenous vein disease precluded use of the vein. In the remaining 50 cases, the entire vein or a portion thereof, with minimal or unsuspected disease, was used for bypass. Early graft failures occurred in 10 (20%) of the 50 cases. The cumulative primary patency rate at 30 months for bypasses performed with diseased veins was 32%. This was significantly less than the 73% cumulative primary patency rate for bypasses with veins without detectable disease (p ≤ 0.001). Retrospective evaluation of preoperative duplex ultrasonography (n = 21) originally used to evaluate saphenous vein length and diameter correctly identified thick-walled, occluded, calcified, and varicose veins in 62% of cases. Intraoperative methods of vein evaluation included inspection, palpation, irrigation, catheter or valvulotome insertion to identify obstruction, and intraoperative arteriography. Histologic examination of diseased veins demonstrated a spectrum of disease with thickening of the intima and media, vein wall calcification, and luminal recanalization. We conclude that (1) unsuspected preexisting saphenous vein disease occurs in approximately 12% of cases and results in both early and late graft failures; (2) detection, in some cases, is possible with duplex ultrasonography and intraoperative techniques; and (3) diseased veins that are recanalized, calcified, or thick-walled should not be used if an alternative vein is available. (J Vasc Surg 1992;15:102–12.)
AB - Our prior anecdotal experience with unsuspected preexisting saphenous vein disease prompted us to study its incidence, its relation to graft failure, and to identify techniques for its detection. Thick-walled, postphlebitic sclerotic occluded, postphlebitic sclerotic recanalized, calcified, and varicose vein lesions were detected in 63 (12%) of 513 infrainguinal vein bypasses. In 13 (2% to 5%) cases, severe saphenous vein disease precluded use of the vein. In the remaining 50 cases, the entire vein or a portion thereof, with minimal or unsuspected disease, was used for bypass. Early graft failures occurred in 10 (20%) of the 50 cases. The cumulative primary patency rate at 30 months for bypasses performed with diseased veins was 32%. This was significantly less than the 73% cumulative primary patency rate for bypasses with veins without detectable disease (p ≤ 0.001). Retrospective evaluation of preoperative duplex ultrasonography (n = 21) originally used to evaluate saphenous vein length and diameter correctly identified thick-walled, occluded, calcified, and varicose veins in 62% of cases. Intraoperative methods of vein evaluation included inspection, palpation, irrigation, catheter or valvulotome insertion to identify obstruction, and intraoperative arteriography. Histologic examination of diseased veins demonstrated a spectrum of disease with thickening of the intima and media, vein wall calcification, and luminal recanalization. We conclude that (1) unsuspected preexisting saphenous vein disease occurs in approximately 12% of cases and results in both early and late graft failures; (2) detection, in some cases, is possible with duplex ultrasonography and intraoperative techniques; and (3) diseased veins that are recanalized, calcified, or thick-walled should not be used if an alternative vein is available. (J Vasc Surg 1992;15:102–12.)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026509563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0741-5214(92)70018-G
DO - 10.1016/0741-5214(92)70018-G
M3 - Article
C2 - 1728668
AN - SCOPUS:0026509563
SN - 0741-5214
VL - 15
SP - 102
EP - 112
JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery
IS - 1
ER -