Unsolicited e-mails to forensic psychiatrists

  • Susan Hatters Friedman
  • , Jacob M. Appel
  • , Peter Ash
  • , Richard L. Frierson
  • , Deborah Giorgi-Guarnieri
  • , Richard Martinez
  • , Alan W. Newman
  • , Debra A. Pinals
  • , Phillip J. Resnick
  • , Alexander I.F. Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

E-mail communication is pervasive. Since many forensic psychiatrists have their e-mail addresses available online (either on personal websites, university websites, or articles they have authored), they are likely to receive unsolicited e-mails. Although there is an emerging body of literature about exchanging e-mail with patients, there is little guidance about how to respond to e-mails from nonpatients. Therefore, we used a Delphi technique to develop a consensus about salient points for the forensic psychiatrist to consider regarding responding to e-mails from nonpatients and the risks entailed. Four scenarios are described, including e-mails from nonpatients and unknown others requesting advice or help. The potential ethics-related, legal, moral, and practical concerns for forensic psychiatrists are discussed. Finally, potential pitfalls for forensic psychiatrists are described.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-478
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume44
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unsolicited e-mails to forensic psychiatrists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this