Ultra-low contrast percutaneous coronary intervention to minimize the risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with severe chronic kidney disease

Lorenzo Azzalini, Alessandra Laricchia, Damiano Regazzoli, Satoru Mitomo, Daisuke Hachinohe, Barbara Bellini, Ozan M. Demir, Enrico Poletti, Davide MacCagni, Antonio Colombo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. The incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is particularly high in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Novel contrast-sparing strategies are warranted to guarantee the benefit of revascularization in this challenging and growing patient population. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an ultra-low contrast volume percutaneous coronary intervention (ULC-PCI) protocol in patients with severe CKD. Methods. The ULC-PCI protocol is based on the prespecification of the maximum contrast volume to be administered, extensive intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and/or dextran-based optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance, and use of diluted contrast media. We created a retrospective registry to compare the outcomes of the ULC-PCI protocol vs conventional angiography-based PCI in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, applying no angiographic or procedural restriction criteria. Results. We included 111 patients (ULC-PCI group, n = 8; conventional group, n = 103). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. Contrast volume (8.8 mL [interquartile range, 1.3-18.5] vs 90 mL [interquartile range, 58-140 mL]; P<.001) was markedly lower in the ULC-PCI group. Technical success was achieved in all ULC-PCI procedures; in 7 of the 8 cases (88%), the ULC-PCI protocol was also successful (contrast-volume-to-eGFR ratio <1). The incidence of CI-AKI was 0% vs 15.5% in the ULC-PCI and conventional groups, respectively (P=.28). Procedures in the ULC-PCI group included the use of rotational atherectomy, two-stent bifurcation PCI, and mechanically supported chronic total occlusion PCI. Conclusions. An ULC-PCI protocol in patients with advanced CKD is feasible, appears to be safe, and has the potential to decrease the incidence of CI-AKI, compared with angiographic guidance alone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-182
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Invasive Cardiology
Volume31
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CI-AKI
  • CIN
  • Contrast-induced acute kidney injury
  • Contrast-induced nephropathy
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ultra-low contrast percutaneous coronary intervention to minimize the risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with severe chronic kidney disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this