Trial by Triad: substituted judgment, mental illness and the right to die

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Substituted judgment has increasingly become the accepted standard for rendering decisions for incapacitated adults in the USA. A broad exception exists with regard to patients with diminished capacity secondary to depressive disorders, as such patients’ previous wishes are generally not honoured when seeking to turn down life-preserving care or pursue aid-in-dying. The result is that physicians often force involuntary treatment on patients with poor medical prognoses and/or low quality of life (PMP/LQL) as a result of their depressive symptoms when similarly situated incapacitated patients without such depressive symptoms would have their previous wishes honoured via substituted judgment. This commentary argues for reconsidering this approach and for using a substituted judgment standard for a subset of EMP/LQL patients seeking death.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Apr 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trial by Triad: substituted judgment, mental illness and the right to die'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this