TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in surgical and transcatheter interventions for tricuspid regurgitation
T2 - A national inpatient sample analysis from 2011 to 2020
AU - Villablanca, Pedro
AU - Jabri, Ahmad
AU - Alhuneafat, Laith
AU - Maligireddy, Anand
AU - Rasheed, Waqas
AU - Kapcin, Kyle
AU - Manalo, Katie
AU - Latib, Azeem
AU - Giustino, Gennaro
AU - Fadel, Raef
AU - Al Abdouh, Ahmad
AU - Mhanna, Mohammed
AU - Amoroso, Nicholas
AU - Wang, Dee Dee
AU - O'Neill, Brian
AU - Bagur, Rodrigo
AU - Madanat, Luai
AU - Renard, Brian
AU - Aggarwal, Vikas
AU - Alqarqaz, Mohammad
AU - So, Kent
AU - Genereux, Philippe
AU - Hanson, Ivan D.
AU - Abbas, Amr E.
AU - O'Neill, William W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) poses a significant health burden, with severe disease linked to poor long-term outcomes, including intractable right heart failure. Despite guidelines advocating intervention, surgical options have historically been limited due to high mortality rates. Advancements in transcatheter valve interventions (TTVI) have renewed interest in less invasive treatments. Methods: Utilizing data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) spanning 2011 to 2020, this study analyzed trends, factors influencing procedure selection, and outcomes of surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions across the United States. The analysis included 98,202 interventions, examining demographic and clinical disparities among patients undergoing TTVI, surgical tricuspid valve repair (STVr), and surgical tricuspid valve replacement (STVR). Results: Between 2011 and 2020, 98,202 TV interventions were analyzed. Over time, total TV interventions increased, with TTVI peaking in 2020 (4.8 %). STVr declined from 78.20 % (2011) to 76.80 % (2020), while STVR decreased from 21.80 % to 18.40 %. Factors influencing procedure selection included age, race, hospital size, teaching status, and comorbidities. STVR accounted for the highest proportion of TV procedure-related deaths, followed by STVr and TTVI. STVR-related deaths declined over time, while STVr-related deaths increased. Conclusion: This study provides a helpful visual representation of mortality trends and can inform healthcare professionals about the changing landscape of TV procedure outcomes. Further analysis would be necessary to understand the underlying causes of these trends, such as changes in patient demographics, procedural volume, technology, and clinical practices over time.
AB - Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) poses a significant health burden, with severe disease linked to poor long-term outcomes, including intractable right heart failure. Despite guidelines advocating intervention, surgical options have historically been limited due to high mortality rates. Advancements in transcatheter valve interventions (TTVI) have renewed interest in less invasive treatments. Methods: Utilizing data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) spanning 2011 to 2020, this study analyzed trends, factors influencing procedure selection, and outcomes of surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions across the United States. The analysis included 98,202 interventions, examining demographic and clinical disparities among patients undergoing TTVI, surgical tricuspid valve repair (STVr), and surgical tricuspid valve replacement (STVR). Results: Between 2011 and 2020, 98,202 TV interventions were analyzed. Over time, total TV interventions increased, with TTVI peaking in 2020 (4.8 %). STVr declined from 78.20 % (2011) to 76.80 % (2020), while STVR decreased from 21.80 % to 18.40 %. Factors influencing procedure selection included age, race, hospital size, teaching status, and comorbidities. STVR accounted for the highest proportion of TV procedure-related deaths, followed by STVr and TTVI. STVR-related deaths declined over time, while STVr-related deaths increased. Conclusion: This study provides a helpful visual representation of mortality trends and can inform healthcare professionals about the changing landscape of TV procedure outcomes. Further analysis would be necessary to understand the underlying causes of these trends, such as changes in patient demographics, procedural volume, technology, and clinical practices over time.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209241354
U2 - 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 39550306
AN - SCOPUS:85209241354
SN - 1553-8389
VL - 78
SP - 97
EP - 103
JO - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
JF - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
ER -