TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends and Variation in Pediatric Anaphylaxis Care From 2016 to 2022
AU - Dribin, Timothy E.
AU - Neuman, Mark I.
AU - Schnadower, David
AU - Sampson, Hugh A.
AU - Porter, John J.
AU - Michelson, Kenneth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (award no. 2UL1TR001425-05A1). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH (award no. 2KL2TR001426-05A1). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. K.A.M. received funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (award no. K08HS026503).
Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest: H. A. Sampson receives funding to his institution for grants from the National Institutes of Health / National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and is employed part-time by and has received stock options from DBV Technologies. T. E. Dribin, M. I. Neuman, D. Schnadower, J. Porter, and K. A. Michelson report no conflicts of interest, no other relationships, or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Background: Variation in the use of treatments and hospitalization for anaphylaxis would suggest a lack of consensus in therapeutic approach. Objective: To evaluate trends and practice variation in the emergency department (ED) care of children with anaphylaxis in a large US cohort. Methods: We conducted a 48-site retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System from January 2016 through September 2022. Children younger than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of anaphylaxis were included. Care trends were assessed using negative binomial regression modeling. Rates of medication use, hospitalizations, and revisits were reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs). Results: There were 42,909 ED visits for anaphylaxis, with a 4.2% per-year increase in visit incidence (95% CI, 1.8-6.7) during the study period. The median hospitalization rate was 3.5% (IQR, 2.2-6.0), and the 3-day ED revisit rate was 0.6% (IQR, 0.4-0.9). The hospital-level median use of therapies included intramuscular epinephrine (55.3%; IQR, 50.1-59.9), systemic steroids (73.8%; IQR, 63.9-81.4), antihistamines (59.9%; IQR, 53.5-65.5), H2-receptor antagonists (56.8%; IQR, 42.3-66.2), bronchodilators (15.1%; IQR, 12.5-17.0), inhaled epinephrine (1.1%; IQR, 0.6-1.9), and fluid boluses (19.8%; IQR, 11.3-29.3). Severe reactions requiring intensive care unit admission (1.5%; IQR, 0.8-2.2), vasopressors (0.3%; IQR, 0.0-0.6), and intubation (0.2%; IQR, 0.0-0.3) were rare. Conclusions: ED visits for anaphylaxis increased during the study period, but hospitalization rates were low. Substantial variation exists between EDs regarding the use of anaphylaxis therapies, supporting the need for future research to evaluate the efficacy of these medications.
AB - Background: Variation in the use of treatments and hospitalization for anaphylaxis would suggest a lack of consensus in therapeutic approach. Objective: To evaluate trends and practice variation in the emergency department (ED) care of children with anaphylaxis in a large US cohort. Methods: We conducted a 48-site retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System from January 2016 through September 2022. Children younger than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of anaphylaxis were included. Care trends were assessed using negative binomial regression modeling. Rates of medication use, hospitalizations, and revisits were reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs). Results: There were 42,909 ED visits for anaphylaxis, with a 4.2% per-year increase in visit incidence (95% CI, 1.8-6.7) during the study period. The median hospitalization rate was 3.5% (IQR, 2.2-6.0), and the 3-day ED revisit rate was 0.6% (IQR, 0.4-0.9). The hospital-level median use of therapies included intramuscular epinephrine (55.3%; IQR, 50.1-59.9), systemic steroids (73.8%; IQR, 63.9-81.4), antihistamines (59.9%; IQR, 53.5-65.5), H2-receptor antagonists (56.8%; IQR, 42.3-66.2), bronchodilators (15.1%; IQR, 12.5-17.0), inhaled epinephrine (1.1%; IQR, 0.6-1.9), and fluid boluses (19.8%; IQR, 11.3-29.3). Severe reactions requiring intensive care unit admission (1.5%; IQR, 0.8-2.2), vasopressors (0.3%; IQR, 0.0-0.6), and intubation (0.2%; IQR, 0.0-0.3) were rare. Conclusions: ED visits for anaphylaxis increased during the study period, but hospitalization rates were low. Substantial variation exists between EDs regarding the use of anaphylaxis therapies, supporting the need for future research to evaluate the efficacy of these medications.
KW - Anaphylaxis
KW - Antihistamines
KW - Bronchodilators
KW - Corticosteroids
KW - Emergency department
KW - Epinephrine
KW - Hospitalizations
KW - Trends
KW - Variation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148630490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.029
DO - 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 36736955
AN - SCOPUS:85148630490
SN - 2213-2198
VL - 11
SP - 1184
EP - 1189
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
IS - 4
ER -