TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes with Anti-CD3 Monoclonal Antibody
AU - Glandt, Mariela
AU - Hagopian, William
AU - Herold, Kevan C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health R01DK57846, U19AI46132, M01RR00645, M01RR01271 and P60DK20595 and a Grants from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation 4-1999-71 and 4-199-841.
PY - 2003/12
Y1 - 2003/12
N2 - In summary, a Pilot trial of hOKT3γ 1 (Ala-Ala) has shown that drug treatment is associated with improvement in the loss of insulin production even beyond 1 year after diagnosis, with improvement in clinical parameters including Hemoglobin A1c and insulin usage, without the need for continuous drug administration. The modified form of the anti-CD3 mAb has an acceptable side effect profile at the dosages used. The mechanism of action is not clear at this time, but preliminary evidence from patients and from murine studies raise the possibility that the anti-CD3 mAb may induce a population(s) of cells that either secrete immune modulatory cytokines and/or themselves can regulate immune responses. Because of the relationship between the strength of the TCR signal delivered by the antibody and the clinical response, data from other anti-CD3 trial(s) that use either different dosing and/or other antibodies will be very informative and may help to develop the hypothesis that the immune regulatory effect of the mAb is due to the TCR signal it imparts in vivo. Other questions have emerged that may be addressed in future trials. The total duration of the clinical response is still not clear, but clearly a lasting effect is needed, since data from transplant studies indicate that autoimmunity can persist and even re-occur when patients with Type 1 diabetes are challenged with islet antigen. Therefore, repeated treatment and/or combination of anti-CD3 mAb with antigen to develop a "vaccine" needs to be considered. In patients with severely impaired β cell function at diagnosis, as was a frequent finding in younger children, even a good clinical response to the drug may not restore β cell mass may result in a significant impairment in functional responses. Therefore an approach to restore β cell mass, either through transplantation or through induction/regeneration of new islet cells, is needed. The convergence of these two approaches to treat Type 1 diabetes may offer a meaningful way to treat the disease even after clinical presentation.
AB - In summary, a Pilot trial of hOKT3γ 1 (Ala-Ala) has shown that drug treatment is associated with improvement in the loss of insulin production even beyond 1 year after diagnosis, with improvement in clinical parameters including Hemoglobin A1c and insulin usage, without the need for continuous drug administration. The modified form of the anti-CD3 mAb has an acceptable side effect profile at the dosages used. The mechanism of action is not clear at this time, but preliminary evidence from patients and from murine studies raise the possibility that the anti-CD3 mAb may induce a population(s) of cells that either secrete immune modulatory cytokines and/or themselves can regulate immune responses. Because of the relationship between the strength of the TCR signal delivered by the antibody and the clinical response, data from other anti-CD3 trial(s) that use either different dosing and/or other antibodies will be very informative and may help to develop the hypothesis that the immune regulatory effect of the mAb is due to the TCR signal it imparts in vivo. Other questions have emerged that may be addressed in future trials. The total duration of the clinical response is still not clear, but clearly a lasting effect is needed, since data from transplant studies indicate that autoimmunity can persist and even re-occur when patients with Type 1 diabetes are challenged with islet antigen. Therefore, repeated treatment and/or combination of anti-CD3 mAb with antigen to develop a "vaccine" needs to be considered. In patients with severely impaired β cell function at diagnosis, as was a frequent finding in younger children, even a good clinical response to the drug may not restore β cell mass may result in a significant impairment in functional responses. Therefore an approach to restore β cell mass, either through transplantation or through induction/regeneration of new islet cells, is needed. The convergence of these two approaches to treat Type 1 diabetes may offer a meaningful way to treat the disease even after clinical presentation.
KW - Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody
KW - Autoimmunity
KW - Immune therapy
KW - Type 1 diabetes mellitus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344306537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1027354129493
DO - 10.1023/A:1027354129493
M3 - Review article
C2 - 14618021
AN - SCOPUS:0344306537
SN - 1389-9155
VL - 4
SP - 361
EP - 368
JO - Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
JF - Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
IS - 4
ER -