Treatment of post-meniscectomy knee symptoms with medial meniscus replacement results in greater pain reduction and functional improvement than non-surgical care

Kenneth R. Zaslav, Jack Farr, Richard Alfred, R. Maxwell Alley, Michael Dyle, Andreas H. Gomoll, Christian Lattermann, Brian P. McKeon, Christopher C. Kaeding, Thomas Giel, Elliott B. Hershman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Partial meniscectomy is a common orthopedic procedure intended to improve knee pain and function in patients with irreparable meniscal tears. However, 6–25% of partial meniscectomy patients experience persistent knee pain after surgery. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving subjects with knee pain following partial meniscectomy, it was hypothesized that treatment with a synthetic medial meniscus replacement (MMR) implant provides significantly greater improvements in knee pain and function compared to non-surgical care alone. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter RCT, subjects with persistent knee pain following one or more previous partial meniscectomies were randomized to receive either MMR or non-surgical care. This analysis evaluated the 1-year outcomes of this 2-year clinical trial. Patient-reported knee pain, function, and quality of life were measured using nine separate patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcomes were the pain subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the average of all five KOOS subscales (KOOS Overall). Treatment cessation was defined as permanent device removal in the MMR group and any surgical procedure to the index knee in the non-surgical care group. Results: Treated subjects had a median age of 52 years old (range 30–69 years) and one or more previous partial meniscectomies at a median of 34 months (range 5–430 months) before trial entry. Among 127 subjects treated with either MMR (n = 61) or non-surgical care (n = 66), 11 withdrew from the trial or were lost to follow-up (MMR, n = 0; non-surgical care, n = 11). The magnitude of improvement from baseline to 1 year was significantly greater in subjects who received MMR in both primary outcomes of KOOS Pain (P = 0.013) and KOOS Overall (P = 0.027). Treatment cessation was reported in 14.5% of non-surgical care subjects and only 4.9% of MMR subjects (n.s.). Conclusion: Treatment with the synthetic MMR implant resulted in significantly greater improvements in knee pain, function, and quality of life at 1 year of follow-up compared to treatment with non-surgical care alone. Level of evidence: I.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1325-1335
Number of pages11
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Implant
  • KOOS
  • Medial meniscus
  • Meniscus lesion
  • Meniscus tear
  • NUsurface
  • Non-surgical care
  • Partial meniscectomy
  • RCT
  • Replacement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of post-meniscectomy knee symptoms with medial meniscus replacement results in greater pain reduction and functional improvement than non-surgical care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this