Treatment-Dose LMWH versus Prophylactic/Intermediate Dose Heparins in High-Risk COVID-19 Inpatients: Rationale and Design of the HEP-COVID Trial

Mark Goldin, Dimitrios Giannis, Wassim Diab, Janice Wang, Sameer Khanijo, Gulru Sharifova, Marc Cohen, Jeet M. Lund, Andrea Mignatti, Eugenia Gianos, Alfonso Tafur, Paul A. Lewis, Kevin Cohoon, John M. Kittelson, Martin L. Lesser, Cristina P. Sison, Husneara Rahman, Kanta Ochani, William R. Hiatt, Rita A. DaleVictoria E. Anderson, Marc Bonaca, Jonathan L. Halperin, Jeffrey I. Weitz, Alex C. Spyropoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and mortality particularly among hospitalized patients with critical illness and elevated D-dimer (Dd) levels. Conflicting data have yet to elucidate optimal thromboprophylaxis dosing. HEP-COVID (NCT04401293) is a phase 3, multicenter, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, pseudo-blinded, active control trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) versus prophylactic-/intermediate-dose LMWH or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for prevention of a primary efficacy composite outcome of VTE, ATE, and all-cause mortality 30 ± 2 days post-enrollment. Eligible patients have COVID-19 diagnosis by nasal swab or serologic testing, requirement for supplemental oxygen per investigator judgment, and Dd >4 × upper limit of normal (ULN) or sepsis-induced coagulopathy score ≥4. Subjects are randomized to enoxaparin 1 mg/kg subcutaneous (SQ)/two times a day (BID) (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 30 mL/min) or 0.5 mg/kg (CrCl 15-30 mL/min) versus local institutional prophylactic regimens including (1) UFH up to 22,500 IU (international unit) daily (divided BID or three times a day), (2) enoxaparin 30 and 40 mg SQ QD (once daily) or BID, or (3) dalteparin 2,500 IU or 5,000 IU QD. The principal safety outcome is major bleeding. Events are adjudicated locally. Based on expected 40% relative risk reduction with treatment-dose compared with prophylactic-dose prophylaxis, 308 subjects will be enrolled (assuming 20% drop-out) to achieve 80% power. Distinguishing design features include an enriched population for the composite endpoint anchored on Dd >4 × ULN, stratification by intensive care unit (ICU) versus non-ICU, and the ability to capture asymptomatic proximal deep venous thrombosis via screening ultrasonography prior to discharge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1684-1695
Number of pages12
JournalThrombosis and Haemostasis
Volume121
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 May 2021

Keywords

  • D-dimer
  • arterial thromboembolism
  • coronavirus disease-2019
  • thromboprophylaxis
  • venous thromboembolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment-Dose LMWH versus Prophylactic/Intermediate Dose Heparins in High-Risk COVID-19 Inpatients: Rationale and Design of the HEP-COVID Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this