TY - JOUR
T1 - Traumatic brain injury as a chronic disease
T2 - insights from the United States Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Research Program
AU - Dams-O'Connor, Kristen
AU - Juengst, Shannon B.
AU - Bogner, Jennifer
AU - Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.
AU - Corrigan, John D.
AU - Giacino, Joseph T.
AU - Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L.
AU - Hoffman, Jeanne M.
AU - Ketchum, Jessica M.
AU - Lequerica, Anthony H.
AU - Marwitz, Jennifer H.
AU - Miller, A. Cate
AU - Nakase-Richardson, Risa
AU - Rabinowitz, Amanda R.
AU - Sander, Angelle M.
AU - Zafonte, Ross
AU - Hammond, Flora M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The contents of this Review were developed under grants from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant numbers 90DPTB0001, 90DPTB0002, 90DPTB0003, 90DPTB0004, 90DPTB0007, 90DPTB0008, 90DPTB0009, 90DPTB0011, 90DPTB0013, 90DPTB0015, 90DPTB0016, 90DBTB0017, 90DPTB0018, and 90DPTB0028). NIDILRR is a centre within the US Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this publication do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and one should not assume endorsement by the US Federal Government. This work was additionally supported by Veterans Health Administration Central Office Veterans Affairs TBI Model Systems Program of Research and, therefore, is defined as US Government work under Title 17 USC§101. Per Title 17 USC§105, copyright protection is not available for any work of the US Government. The views expressed in this Review are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Veterans Health Administration, US Government. The funding source had no input in the conception or preparation of this Review. All research described herein was conducted with approval from ethics committees, programmes for the protection of human subjects research, and institutional review boards at all participating sites. Jordyn Anderson and Danny Oporto assisted with initial manuscript culling. Following the updated literature search (2022, PubMed), the manuscript was reviewed by Samuel Preminger, Brittany Wright, Alexandra Holland, Samrudhi Mishra, Yusra Waris, and Kavya Donepudi. Brittany Engelman assisted with extracting data from newly identified manuscripts.
Funding Information:
The contents of this Review were developed under grants from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant numbers 90DPTB0001, 90DPTB0002, 90DPTB0003, 90DPTB0004, 90DPTB0007, 90DPTB0008, 90DPTB0009, 90DPTB0011, 90DPTB0013, 90DPTB0015, 90DPTB0016, 90DBTB0017, 90DPTB0018, and 90DPTB0028). NIDILRR is a centre within the US Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this publication do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and one should not assume endorsement by the US Federal Government. This work was additionally supported by Veterans Health Administration Central Office Veterans Affairs TBI Model Systems Program of Research and, therefore, is defined as US Government work under Title 17 USC§101. Per Title 17 USC§105, copyright protection is not available for any work of the US Government. The views expressed in this Review are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Veterans Health Administration, US Government. The funding source had no input in the conception or preparation of this Review. All research described herein was conducted with approval from ethics committees, programmes for the protection of human subjects research, and institutional review boards at all participating sites. Jordyn Anderson and Danny Oporto assisted with initial manuscript culling. Following the updated literature search (2022, PubMed), the manuscript was reviewed by Samuel Preminger, Brittany Wright, Alexandra Holland, Samrudhi Mishra, Yusra Waris, and Kavya Donepudi. Brittany Engelman assisted with extracting data from newly identified manuscripts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health priority, associated with substantial burden. Historically conceptualised as an injury event with finite recovery, TBI is now recognised as a chronic condition that can affect multiple domains of health and function, some of which might deteriorate over time. Many people who have had a TBI remain moderately to severely disabled at 5 years, are rehospitalised up to 10 years post-injury, and have a reduced lifespan relative to the general population. Understanding TBI as a chronic disease process can be highly informative for optimising care, which has traditionally focused on acute care. Chronic brain injury care models must be informed by a holistic understanding of long-term outcomes and the factors that can affect how care needs evolve over time. The United States Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care follows up individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI for over 30 years, allowing characterisation of the chronic (2–30 years or more post injury) functional, cognitive, behavioural, and social sequelae experienced by individuals who have had a moderate-to-severe TBI and the implications for their health and quality of life. Older age, social determinants of health, and lower acute functional status are associated with post-recovery deterioration, while younger age and greater functional independence are associated with risky health behaviours, including substance misuse and re-injury. Systematically collected data on long-term outcomes across multiple domains of health and function are needed worldwide to inform the development of models for chronic disease management, including the proactive surveillance of commonly experienced health and functional challenges.
AB - Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health priority, associated with substantial burden. Historically conceptualised as an injury event with finite recovery, TBI is now recognised as a chronic condition that can affect multiple domains of health and function, some of which might deteriorate over time. Many people who have had a TBI remain moderately to severely disabled at 5 years, are rehospitalised up to 10 years post-injury, and have a reduced lifespan relative to the general population. Understanding TBI as a chronic disease process can be highly informative for optimising care, which has traditionally focused on acute care. Chronic brain injury care models must be informed by a holistic understanding of long-term outcomes and the factors that can affect how care needs evolve over time. The United States Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care follows up individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI for over 30 years, allowing characterisation of the chronic (2–30 years or more post injury) functional, cognitive, behavioural, and social sequelae experienced by individuals who have had a moderate-to-severe TBI and the implications for their health and quality of life. Older age, social determinants of health, and lower acute functional status are associated with post-recovery deterioration, while younger age and greater functional independence are associated with risky health behaviours, including substance misuse and re-injury. Systematically collected data on long-term outcomes across multiple domains of health and function are needed worldwide to inform the development of models for chronic disease management, including the proactive surveillance of commonly experienced health and functional challenges.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159022071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00065-0
DO - 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00065-0
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37086742
AN - SCOPUS:85159022071
SN - 1474-4422
VL - 22
SP - 517
EP - 528
JO - The Lancet Neurology
JF - The Lancet Neurology
IS - 6
ER -