Transcatheter valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring implantation with a novel balloon-expandable device in patients with bioprosthetic left side heart valves failure: 1-year follow-up from a multicenter experience

Elisabetta Moscarella, Alfonso Ielasi, Abdurashid Mussayev, Matteo Montorfano, Ajit Mullassari, Pedro Martin, Luca Testa, John Jose, Vlasis Ninios, Kostantinos Toutouzas, Francesco Giannini, Attila Kertesz, Daniel Unic, Henrik Nissen, Babu Ezhumalai, Nagendra Boopathy Senguttuvan, Ignacio Amat-Santos, Ashok Seth, Francesco Bedogni, Maurizio Tespili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic and mitral valve-in-valve (ViV) or valve-in-ring (ViR) implantation into failed bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) or rings represents an appealing, less invasive, treatment option for patients at high surgical risk. Nowadays, few data have been reported on the use of balloon-expandable Myval (Meril Life Science, Vapi, India) transcatheter heart valve (THV) for the treatment of degenerated BHVs or rings. We aimed at evaluating the early and mid-term clinical outcomes of patients with left side heart bioprosthesis deterioration treated with transcatheter ViV/ViR implantation using Myval THV. Methods: 97 consecutive patients with symptomatic, severe aortic(n=33) and mitral(n=64) BHVs/ring dysfunction underwent transcatheter aortic ViV and mitral ViV/ViR implantation with Myval THV. Results: Technical success was achieved in 95 (98%) of the patients. Two cases of acute structural trans-catheter mitral ViV/ViR dysfunction requiring a second THV implantation were reported. At 30-day, a significant reduction in prosthetic trans-valvular pressure gradients and increase in valve areas were seen following both aortic and mitral ViV/ViR implantation. Overall survival at 15 months (IQR 8-21) was 92%. Patients undergoing mitral ViV/ViR had a relatively worse survival compared with those undergoing aortic ViV implantation (89% vs. 97% respectively; HR:2.7,CI:0.33-22.7;p=0.34). At longest follow-up available a significant improvement in NYHA functional class I and II was observed in patients with aortic and mitral ViV/ViR implantation(93.8% and 92.1%). Conclusions: Despite high surgical risk, transcatheter ViV/ViR implantation for failed left side heart bioprosthesis can be performed safely using Myval THV with a high success rate and low early and mid-term mortality and morbidity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-45
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume376
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aortic valve replacement
  • Bioprosthetic valve failure
  • Mitral valve replacement
  • Myval transcatheter heart valve
  • Transcatheter valve-in-ring
  • Transcatheter valve-in-valve

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transcatheter valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring implantation with a novel balloon-expandable device in patients with bioprosthetic left side heart valves failure: 1-year follow-up from a multicenter experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this