TY - JOUR
T1 - Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision
T2 - International Registry Results of the First 720 Cases
AU - the TaTME Registry Collaborative
AU - Penna, Marta
AU - Hompes, Roel
AU - Arnold, Steve
AU - Wynn, Greg
AU - Austin, Ralph
AU - Warusavitarne, Janindra
AU - Moran, Brendan
AU - Hanna, George B.
AU - Mortensen, Neil J.
AU - Tekkis, Paris P.
AU - Albert, Matthew
AU - Al Furajii, Hazar
AU - Allison, Andrew
AU - Arezzo, Alberto
AU - Aryal, Kamal
AU - Ashraf, Shazad
AU - Atallah, Sam
AU - Baig, Khurrum
AU - Baral, Jörg
AU - Bemelman, Willem
AU - Berger, David
AU - Boni, Luigi
AU - Bonjer, Jaap
AU - Bordeianou, Liliana
AU - Borreca, Dario
AU - Buchs, Nicolas Christian
AU - Cahill, Ronan
AU - Campbell, Ken
AU - Capolupo, Gabriella
AU - Caricato, Marco
AU - Cassinotti, Elisa
AU - Chambers, William
AU - Courtney, Edward Douglas
AU - Cunningham, Christopher
AU - Dalton, Stephan
AU - Dawson, Robin
AU - Delrio, Paolo
AU - De Graaf, Eelco
AU - De Paolis, Paolo
AU - D'Hondt, Mathieu
AU - D'Hoore, André
AU - Doornebosch, Pascal
AU - Erikson, Jens Ravn
AU - Estévez-Schwarz, Lope
AU - Fabryko, Miroslava
AU - Fernández-Hevia, Maria
AU - Forsmo, Havard
AU - Francis, Nader
AU - Garimella, Veera
AU - Sylla, Patricia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Objective: This study aims to report short-term clinical and oncological outcomes from the international transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) registry for benign and malignant rectal pathology. Background: TaTME is the latest minimally invasive transanal technique pioneered to facilitate difficult pelvic dissections. Outcomes have been published from small cohorts, but larger series can further assess the safety and efficacy of taTME in the wider surgical population. Methods: Data were analyzed from 66 registered units in 23 countries. The primary endpoint was "good-quality TME surgery." Secondary endpoints were short-term adverse events. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of poor specimen outcome. Results: A total of 720 consecutively registered cases were analyzed comprising 634 patients with rectal cancer and 86 with benign pathology. Approximately, 67% were males with mean BMI 26.5 kg/m 2. Abdominal or perineal conversion was 6.3% and 2.8%, respectively. Intact TME specimens were achieved in 85%, with minor defects in 11% and major defects in 4%. R1 resection rate was 2.7%. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0.5% and 32.6% respectively. Risk factors for poor specimen outcome (suboptimal TME specimen, perforation, and/or R1 resection) on multivariate analysis were positive CRM on staging MRI, low rectal tumor <2 cm from anorectal junction, and laparoscopic transabdominal posterior dissection to <4 cm from anal verge. Conclusions: TaTME appears to be an oncologically safe and effective technique for distal mesorectal dissection with acceptable short-term patient outcomes and good specimen quality. Ongoing structured training and the upcoming randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the technique further.
AB - Objective: This study aims to report short-term clinical and oncological outcomes from the international transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) registry for benign and malignant rectal pathology. Background: TaTME is the latest minimally invasive transanal technique pioneered to facilitate difficult pelvic dissections. Outcomes have been published from small cohorts, but larger series can further assess the safety and efficacy of taTME in the wider surgical population. Methods: Data were analyzed from 66 registered units in 23 countries. The primary endpoint was "good-quality TME surgery." Secondary endpoints were short-term adverse events. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of poor specimen outcome. Results: A total of 720 consecutively registered cases were analyzed comprising 634 patients with rectal cancer and 86 with benign pathology. Approximately, 67% were males with mean BMI 26.5 kg/m 2. Abdominal or perineal conversion was 6.3% and 2.8%, respectively. Intact TME specimens were achieved in 85%, with minor defects in 11% and major defects in 4%. R1 resection rate was 2.7%. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0.5% and 32.6% respectively. Risk factors for poor specimen outcome (suboptimal TME specimen, perforation, and/or R1 resection) on multivariate analysis were positive CRM on staging MRI, low rectal tumor <2 cm from anorectal junction, and laparoscopic transabdominal posterior dissection to <4 cm from anal verge. Conclusions: TaTME appears to be an oncologically safe and effective technique for distal mesorectal dissection with acceptable short-term patient outcomes and good specimen quality. Ongoing structured training and the upcoming randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the technique further.
KW - poor histological outcomes
KW - rectal cancer
KW - registry
KW - risk factors
KW - transanal total mesorectal excision
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991439239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001948
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001948
M3 - Article
C2 - 27735827
AN - SCOPUS:84991439239
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 266
SP - 111
EP - 117
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 1
ER -