TY - JOUR
T1 - Tracking workforce diversity in dentistry
T2 - Importance, methods, and challenges
AU - Mertz, Elizabeth
AU - Wides, Cynthia
AU - Cooke, Alexis
AU - Gates, Paul E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Association of Public Health Dentistry.
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Objectives The objectives of this paper are to describe sources of data on underrepresented minority (URM) dental providers and to perform a structured critique of primary survey research on African American (AA), Hispanic/Latino (HL), and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) dentists. Methods A national sample survey was conducted between October 2012 and March 2013, and secondary datasets were assessed for comparability. The survey used 21 sampling frames, with censuses of AI/AN and nonurban dentists, and assessed demographics, education, practice history, patient population, volunteerism, experiences with discrimination, and opinions on issues in dentistry. The survey was developed with constituent input, pilot-tested, and distributed online and through US mail with three reminder postcards, phone, and email follow-up. Continuing education credit and entry to a prize drawing were provided for participation. Results Existing data sources cannot answer critical research questions about URM dentists. Using best practices, the survey received a 34 percent adjusted response rate. Selection likelihood and measurable response bias were adjusted for using base and poststratification weights. Conclusions The survey design was consistent with best practices, and our response analytics provide high confidence that the survey produced data representative of the URM dentist population. Enhanced study design, content, and response rates of existing survey efforts would be needed to provide a more robust body of knowledge on URM providers, perspectives, and practices.
AB - Objectives The objectives of this paper are to describe sources of data on underrepresented minority (URM) dental providers and to perform a structured critique of primary survey research on African American (AA), Hispanic/Latino (HL), and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) dentists. Methods A national sample survey was conducted between October 2012 and March 2013, and secondary datasets were assessed for comparability. The survey used 21 sampling frames, with censuses of AI/AN and nonurban dentists, and assessed demographics, education, practice history, patient population, volunteerism, experiences with discrimination, and opinions on issues in dentistry. The survey was developed with constituent input, pilot-tested, and distributed online and through US mail with three reminder postcards, phone, and email follow-up. Continuing education credit and entry to a prize drawing were provided for participation. Results Existing data sources cannot answer critical research questions about URM dentists. Using best practices, the survey received a 34 percent adjusted response rate. Selection likelihood and measurable response bias were adjusted for using base and poststratification weights. Conclusions The survey design was consistent with best practices, and our response analytics provide high confidence that the survey produced data representative of the URM dentist population. Enhanced study design, content, and response rates of existing survey efforts would be needed to provide a more robust body of knowledge on URM providers, perspectives, and practices.
KW - data collection
KW - dentists
KW - minority groups
KW - questionnaires
KW - survey research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960501690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jphd.12109
DO - 10.1111/jphd.12109
M3 - Article
C2 - 26183241
AN - SCOPUS:84960501690
SN - 0022-4006
VL - 76
SP - 38
EP - 46
JO - Journal of Public Health Dentistry
JF - Journal of Public Health Dentistry
IS - 1
ER -