TY - JOUR
T1 - Topical anesthetic techniques in office-based laryngeal surgery
T2 - A comparison of patient preferences
AU - Naunheim, Matthew R.
AU - Woo, Peak
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Objectives: Multiple topical anesthesia techniques exist for office-based laryngeal surgery. Our objective was to assess patient and surgeon satisfaction for three different techniques. Study Design: Cohort study. Methods: All consecutive patients presenting to an outpatient laryngology office for awake surgical procedures were enrolled. Patients were anesthetized with local anesthesia (2 cubic centimeters of 4% lidocaine) in one of three ways: 1) nebulizer, 2) flexible cannula through a channeled laryngoscope, or 3) transtracheal instillation. Demographics, procedure times, and surgeon satisfaction were recorded. A validated 11-item patient satisfaction questionnaire (Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Survey) was administered after the procedure to calculate an overall satisfaction score (−3[worst] to 3[best]). Descriptive and correlative statistics were performed. Results: One hundred consecutive patients were included (37 females, 73 males), with relatively equal numbers between groups (32 nebulizer, 35 cannula, 33 transtracheal). Seven procedures were aborted (4 nebulizer, 2 cannula, 1 transtracheal) due to movement, anxiety, or technical issues. Three patients did not adequately complete the survey. Of the 90 remaining patients, patient satisfaction was highest with the transtracheal technique (2.04) versus cannula (1.46) or nebulizer (1.45), and this was statistically significant (P = 0.0167). This difference was driven by decreased pain and nausea scores in the transtracheal group. Surgeon satisfaction was lower with nebulizer and higher with transtracheal injection (P = 0.0081). There was a correlation between surgeon satisfaction and patient satisfaction (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Transtracheal instillation was favored by both patients and the surgeon. Choice of local anesthetic techniques may impact patient preferences and surgical success. This may serve as a basis for optimizing anesthetic care in office-based laryngeal surgery. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:166–170, 2020.
AB - Objectives: Multiple topical anesthesia techniques exist for office-based laryngeal surgery. Our objective was to assess patient and surgeon satisfaction for three different techniques. Study Design: Cohort study. Methods: All consecutive patients presenting to an outpatient laryngology office for awake surgical procedures were enrolled. Patients were anesthetized with local anesthesia (2 cubic centimeters of 4% lidocaine) in one of three ways: 1) nebulizer, 2) flexible cannula through a channeled laryngoscope, or 3) transtracheal instillation. Demographics, procedure times, and surgeon satisfaction were recorded. A validated 11-item patient satisfaction questionnaire (Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Survey) was administered after the procedure to calculate an overall satisfaction score (−3[worst] to 3[best]). Descriptive and correlative statistics were performed. Results: One hundred consecutive patients were included (37 females, 73 males), with relatively equal numbers between groups (32 nebulizer, 35 cannula, 33 transtracheal). Seven procedures were aborted (4 nebulizer, 2 cannula, 1 transtracheal) due to movement, anxiety, or technical issues. Three patients did not adequately complete the survey. Of the 90 remaining patients, patient satisfaction was highest with the transtracheal technique (2.04) versus cannula (1.46) or nebulizer (1.45), and this was statistically significant (P = 0.0167). This difference was driven by decreased pain and nausea scores in the transtracheal group. Surgeon satisfaction was lower with nebulizer and higher with transtracheal injection (P = 0.0081). There was a correlation between surgeon satisfaction and patient satisfaction (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Transtracheal instillation was favored by both patients and the surgeon. Choice of local anesthetic techniques may impact patient preferences and surgical success. This may serve as a basis for optimizing anesthetic care in office-based laryngeal surgery. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:166–170, 2020.
KW - Laryngology
KW - in-office procedures
KW - patient preferences
KW - topical anesthesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062487855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lary.27894
DO - 10.1002/lary.27894
M3 - Article
C2 - 30835852
AN - SCOPUS:85062487855
SN - 0023-852X
VL - 130
SP - 166
EP - 170
JO - Laryngoscope
JF - Laryngoscope
IS - 1
ER -