Time Differences from Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening to Colposcopy between Insurance Statuses

Objective Screening and diagnostic follow-up to prevent cervical cancer are influenced by socioeconomic and systemic factors. This study sought to characterize intervals from abnormal cervical cancer screening to colposcopy between practices differing by insurance status at a large, urban academic center. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 21-65 who presented for colposcopy between January 1, 2021, and January 1, 2022, at the resident and faculty gynecology practices of a single large urban academic medical center. Patient characteristics were compared using t tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous measures and χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical measures. Intervals from abnormal cervical cancer screening to colposcopy were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and linear regression analysis with multivariable models adjusted for age, cervical cytology result, human papillomavirus result, and HIV status. Results Resident practice patients were publicly insured and more likely to be Black or Hispanic (p <.0001); rates of high-risk human papillomavirus and smoking were similar. Resident practice patients had longer intervals from abnormal cervical cancer screening to colposcopy compared with faculty practice patients (median 79.5 vs 34 d, p <.0001). On adjusted analysis, resident practice patients faced a 95% longer interval (p <.0001). Conclusions Publicly insured patients of a resident-based practice faced significantly longer intervals from abnormal cervical cancer screening to colposcopy than faculty practice patients at a single urban academic center. Effort to address these differences may be an area of focus in improving health disparities.