Ticagrelor Monotherapy After PCI in High-Risk Patients With Prior MI: A Prespecified TWILIGHT Substudy

Mauro Chiarito, Usman Baber, Davide Cao, Samin K. Sharma, George Dangas, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Carlo Briguori, David J. Cohen, Dariusz Dudek, Vladimír Džavík, Javier Escaned, Robert Gil, Christian W. Hamm, Timothy Henry, Kurt Huber, Adnan Kastrati, Upendra Kaul, Ran Kornowski, Mitchell Krucoff, Vijay KunadianShamir R. Mehta, David Moliterno, E. Magnus Ohman, Keith Oldroyd, Gennaro Sardella, Zhang Zhongjie, Samantha Sartori, Giulio Stefanini, Richard Shlofmitz, P. Gabriel Steg, Giora Weisz, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Ya ling Han, Stuart Pocock, C. Michael Gibson, Roxana Mehran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate if patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) could benefit from ticagrelor monotherapy in terms of bleeding reduction without any compromise in ischemic event prevention. Background: Patients with history of MI who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain at risk for recurrent ischemic events. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for this cohort remains debated. Methods: In this prespecified analysis of the randomized TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial, the authors evaluated the impact of history of MI on treatment effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent with at least 1 clinical and 1 angiographic high-risk feature and free from adverse events at 3 months after index PCI. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, and the key secondary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, MI, or stroke, both at 12 months after randomization. Results: A total of 1,937 patients (29.7%) with and 4,595 patients (70.3%) without prior MI were randomized to ticagrelor and placebo or ticagrelor and aspirin. At 1 year after randomization, patients with prior MI experienced higher rates of death, MI, or stroke (5.7% vs 3.2%; P < 0.001) but similar BARC types 2 to 5 bleeding (5.0% vs 5.5%; P = 0.677) compared with patients without prior MI. Ticagrelor monotherapy consistently reduced the risk for the primary bleeding outcome in patients with (3.4% vs 6.7%; HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.33-0.76) and without (4.2% vs 7.0%; HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.76; Pinteraction = 0.54) prior MI. Rates of the key secondary ischemic outcome were not significantly different between treatment groups irrespective of history of MI (prior MI, 6.0% vs 5.5% [HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.75-1.58]; no prior MI, 3.1% vs 3.3% [HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.67-1.28]; Pinteraction = 0.52). Conclusions: Ticagrelor monotherapy is associated with significantly lower risk for bleeding events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, without any compromise in ischemic prevention, among high-risk patients with history of MI undergoing PCI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-293
Number of pages12
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Feb 2022

Keywords

  • aspirin
  • drug-eluting stent(s)
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • prior myocardial infarction
  • ticagrelor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ticagrelor Monotherapy After PCI in High-Risk Patients With Prior MI: A Prespecified TWILIGHT Substudy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this