TY - JOUR
T1 - Thrombolysis outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients with prior stroke and diabetes mellitus
AU - Mishra, N. K.
AU - Ahmed, N.
AU - Davalos, A.
AU - Iversen, H. K.
AU - Melo, T.
AU - Soinne, L.
AU - Wahlgren, N.
AU - Lees, K. R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Mishra reports no disclosures. Dr. Ahmed is an employee of SITS International, which received a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim for the SITS-MOST/SITS-ISTR study with alteplase. Dr. Davalos has received speaker or consultancy honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck Inc., ev3, Ferrer, and Talecris Biotherapeutics. Dr. Iversen has served on scientific advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim and Allergan, Inc.; and has received research support from the Danish National Advanced Science Foundation. Dr. Melo reports no disclosures. Dr. Soinne serves on speakers' bureaus for and has received speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer Inc, and Siemens; and has served as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Wahlgren serves as Chairman of the SITS Scientific Committee; has served on scientific advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim and ThromboGenics NV; has received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck Inc., and Ferrer; and serves on the editorial boards of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. Dr. Lees serves on scientific advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Talecris Biotherapeutics, Lundbeck Inc., Ferrer, and PhotoThera; and has received speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck Inc., ThromboGenics NV, and Talecris Biotherapeutics.
Funding Information:
This study was supported by an educational grant to Dr. N.K. Mishra from European Stroke Organisation meant for Young Neurologists and scholarships from British ORS Studentship and a University of Glasgow scholarship. VISTA has received financial support from the European Stroke Organisation in the form of an unrestricted grant, and contributions towards data extraction and capacity building from the Universities of Glasgow, California San Diego, Nottingham, Edmonton, Calgary, Texas, and Massachusetts; from commercial groups including BrainsGate, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and the Vertical Group; and from grant agencies and charities including the UK Stroke Association. SITS-ISTR is funded by an unrestricted grant from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer, and by a grant from European Union Public Health Executive Authority (PHEA). Financial support was also provided through the regional agreement on medical training and research (A.L.F.) between Stockholm County Council and the Karolinska Institute.
PY - 2011/11/22
Y1 - 2011/11/22
N2 - Background: Patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) and prior stroke (PS) were excluded from European approval of alteplase in stroke. We examined the influence ofDMand PS on the outcomes of patients who received thrombolytic therapy (T; data from Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register) compared to nonthrombolyzed controls (C; data from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive). Methods: We selected ischemic stroke patients on whom we held data on age, baseline NIH Stroke Scale score (NIHSS), and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS). We compared the distribution of mRS between T and C by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test and proportional odds logistic regression, after adjustment for age and baseline NIHSS, in patients with and without DM, PS, or the combination. We report odds ratios (OR) for improved distribution of mRS with 95% confidence interval (CI) and CMH p value. Results: Data were available for 29,500 patients: 5,411 (18.5%) had DM, 5,019 had PS (17.1%), and 1,141 (5.5%) had both. Adjusted mRS outcomes were better for T vs C among patients with DM (OR 1.45 [1.30-1.62], n = 5,354), PS (OR 1.55 [1.40-1.72], n = 4,986), or concomitant DM and PS (OR 1.23 [0.996-1.52], p = 0.05, n = 1,136), all CMH p < 0.0001. These are comparable to outcomes between T and C among patients with neither DM nor PS: OR = 1.53 (1.42-1.63), p < 0.0001, n = 19,339. There was no interaction on outcome between DM and PS with alteplase treatment (tissue plasminogen activator × DM × PS, p = 0.5). Age ±80 years or >80 years did not influence our findings. Conclusions: Outcomes from thrombolysis are better than the controls among patients with DM, PS, or both. We find no statistical justification for the exclusion of these patients from receiving thrombolytic therapy.
AB - Background: Patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) and prior stroke (PS) were excluded from European approval of alteplase in stroke. We examined the influence ofDMand PS on the outcomes of patients who received thrombolytic therapy (T; data from Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register) compared to nonthrombolyzed controls (C; data from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive). Methods: We selected ischemic stroke patients on whom we held data on age, baseline NIH Stroke Scale score (NIHSS), and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS). We compared the distribution of mRS between T and C by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test and proportional odds logistic regression, after adjustment for age and baseline NIHSS, in patients with and without DM, PS, or the combination. We report odds ratios (OR) for improved distribution of mRS with 95% confidence interval (CI) and CMH p value. Results: Data were available for 29,500 patients: 5,411 (18.5%) had DM, 5,019 had PS (17.1%), and 1,141 (5.5%) had both. Adjusted mRS outcomes were better for T vs C among patients with DM (OR 1.45 [1.30-1.62], n = 5,354), PS (OR 1.55 [1.40-1.72], n = 4,986), or concomitant DM and PS (OR 1.23 [0.996-1.52], p = 0.05, n = 1,136), all CMH p < 0.0001. These are comparable to outcomes between T and C among patients with neither DM nor PS: OR = 1.53 (1.42-1.63), p < 0.0001, n = 19,339. There was no interaction on outcome between DM and PS with alteplase treatment (tissue plasminogen activator × DM × PS, p = 0.5). Age ±80 years or >80 years did not influence our findings. Conclusions: Outcomes from thrombolysis are better than the controls among patients with DM, PS, or both. We find no statistical justification for the exclusion of these patients from receiving thrombolytic therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955243840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318238ee42
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318238ee42
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:82955243840
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 77
SP - 1866
EP - 1872
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 21
ER -