Three-year follow-up of an implanted functional electrical stimulation system for upright mobility in a child with a thoracic level spinal cord injury

  • Randal R. Betz
  • , Therese E. Johnston
  • , Brian T. Smith
  • , M. J. Mulcahey
  • , James J. McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the use of a functional electrical stimulation (FES) system with the use of knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFO) for upright mobility over a 3-year period in a child with a spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A 13-year-old boy with a T8 complete SCI received a lower extremity implanted FES system. Electrodes were implanted for knee extension and for hip extension, abduction, and adduction. After training and at annual intervals, independence and timeliness in completing 7 upright mobility activities with FES and KAFO, as well as stimulated muscle strength, were assessed. Results: Results have shown that FES provided independence equal to that of KAFO for all activities. Four activities were accomplished more quickly with FES, including donning the system, reaching a high object, transferring to a high surface, and walking 6 m. A floor-to-stand transfer was faster with KAFO. Functional results and stimulated muscle strength have remained stable over the 3-year period. Conclusion: The results indicate that FES can provide function equal to or faster than KAFO in a child with a T8 complete SCI and that performance with the FES system can remain stable for at least 3 years.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-350
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ambulation
  • Functional electrical stimulation
  • Paraplegia
  • Pediatrics
  • Rehabilitation
  • Spinal cord injuries

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three-year follow-up of an implanted functional electrical stimulation system for upright mobility in a child with a thoracic level spinal cord injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this