Thought disorder in schizopheria and mania: Impaired context

  • Martin Harrow
  • , Kristin E. Green
  • , James R. Sands
  • , Thomas H. Jobe
  • , Joseph F. Goldberg
  • , Kalman J. Kaplan
  • , Eileen M. Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research studied hypotheses that positive thought disorder in schizophrenia is influenced by patients' not taking in immediate target contextual material, thereby losing vital cues that guide thought processes. We assessed 164 acute inpatients (including 55 schizophrenia and 31 bipolar disorder patients), using standardized measures of thought disorder. We also used new measures that assessed (1) total ignoring of context, and (2) straying from the context. Results were as follows: (1) only 9 percent of the schizophrenia patients showed strong evidence of completely ignoring the external context; (2) straying from the external context while simultaneously maintaining part of the context was significantly more common than complete absence of context (p < 0.01); (3) patients with thought disorder strayed from the context significantly more than patients without thought disorder (p < 6.661); and (4) straying from the context was involved in the thought disorder of some, but not all, schizophrenia and mania patients. The data suggest that thought disorder in schizophrenia is not typically due to a failure to 'hear' or to take in the relevant contextual material necessary for an appropriate response. Loss of context is involved in some, but not all, thought disorder in schizophrenia and mania.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)879-891
Number of pages13
JournalSchizophrenia Bulletin
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Associative processes
  • Bipolar manic disorders
  • Context
  • Schizophrenia
  • Thought disorder
  • Working memory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thought disorder in schizopheria and mania: Impaired context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this