TY - JOUR
T1 - Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease
T2 - unmet needs and future perspectives
AU - International Consortium for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
AU - Papamichael, Konstantinos
AU - Afif, Waqqas
AU - Drobne, David
AU - Dubinsky, Marla C.
AU - Ferrante, Marc
AU - Irving, Peter M.
AU - Kamperidis, Nikolaos
AU - Kobayashi, Taku
AU - Kotze, Paulo G.
AU - Lambert, Jo
AU - Noor, Nurulamin M.
AU - Roblin, Xavier
AU - Roda, Giulia
AU - Vande Casteele, Niels
AU - Yarur, Andres J.
AU - Arebi, Naila
AU - Danese, Silvio
AU - Paul, Stephane
AU - Sandborn, William J.
AU - Vermeire, Séverine
AU - Cheifetz, Adam S.
AU - Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a useful tool for optimising the use of biologics, and in particular anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, challenges remain and are hindering the widespread implementation of TDM in clinical practice. These barriers include identification of the optimal drug concentration to target, the lag time between sampling and results, and the proper interpretation of anti-drug antibody titres among different assays. Solutions to overcome these barriers include the harmonisation of TDM assays and the use of point-of-care testing. Other unmet needs include well designed prospective studies and randomised controlled trials focusing on proactive TDM, particularly during induction therapy. Future studies should also investigate the utility of TDM for biologics other than anti-TNF therapies in both IBD and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, and the use of pharmacokinetic modelling dashboards and pharmacogenetics towards individual personalised medicine.
AB - Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a useful tool for optimising the use of biologics, and in particular anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, challenges remain and are hindering the widespread implementation of TDM in clinical practice. These barriers include identification of the optimal drug concentration to target, the lag time between sampling and results, and the proper interpretation of anti-drug antibody titres among different assays. Solutions to overcome these barriers include the harmonisation of TDM assays and the use of point-of-care testing. Other unmet needs include well designed prospective studies and randomised controlled trials focusing on proactive TDM, particularly during induction therapy. Future studies should also investigate the utility of TDM for biologics other than anti-TNF therapies in both IBD and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, and the use of pharmacokinetic modelling dashboards and pharmacogenetics towards individual personalised medicine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122492646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00223-5
DO - 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00223-5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35026171
AN - SCOPUS:85122492646
SN - 2468-1253
VL - 7
SP - 171
EP - 185
JO - The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 2
ER -