TY - JOUR
T1 - The Utilization and Safety of Same-Day Discharge After Transurethral Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery
T2 - A Case-Control, Matched Analysis of a National Cohort
AU - Garden, Evan B.
AU - Ravivarapu, Krishna T.
AU - Levy, Micah
AU - Chin, Chih Peng
AU - Omidele, Olamide
AU - Tomer, Nir
AU - Al-Alao, Osama
AU - Araya, Joseph Sewell
AU - Small, Alexander C.
AU - Palese, Michael A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Objective: To analyze the utilization and safety of same-day (SDD) vs standard-length discharge (SLD) for transurethral resection (TURP), holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP), and GreenLight photovaporization (GL-PVP) of the prostate. Methods: Using the 2015-2019 ACS-NSQIP files, the annual proportion of TURP, HoLEP, and GL-PVP performed with SDD (length of stay [LOS] = 0 days) was calculated. Patients were stratified by LOS into SDD and SLD (TURP: LOS = 1-3 days, HoLEP and GL-PVP: LOS = 1-2 days); those with longer LOS were excluded. Patients were matched 1:1 by age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index score. We compared 30-day unplanned readmissions, reoperations, and Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications between SLD and SDD, and evaluated predictors of adverse outcomes using logistic regression. Results: Most GL-PVP patients underwent SDD, compared to a minority of TURP and HoLEP patients. SDD utilization increased, remained stable, and decreased over time for HoLEP, TURP, and GL-PVP, respectively. For 46,898 included cases (31,872 TURP, 2,901 HoLEP, 12,125 GL-PVP), rates of reoperation, CD I/II, or CD IV complications were comparable before and after matching. Compared to SLD, 30-day unplanned readmission rates for matched SDD patients were lower following TURP (3.48% vs 4.25%, P = .013) and HoLEP (1.93% vs 4.43%, P = .003). On multivariate regression, SLD correlated with unplanned readmission after TURP and HoLEP for both unmatched and matched cohorts. Conclusion: For appropriately selected patients, SDD after TURP, HoLEP, and GL-PVP did not confer increased risk of 30-day complications, suggesting patient selection for SDD is being done with appropriate safety nationally.
AB - Objective: To analyze the utilization and safety of same-day (SDD) vs standard-length discharge (SLD) for transurethral resection (TURP), holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP), and GreenLight photovaporization (GL-PVP) of the prostate. Methods: Using the 2015-2019 ACS-NSQIP files, the annual proportion of TURP, HoLEP, and GL-PVP performed with SDD (length of stay [LOS] = 0 days) was calculated. Patients were stratified by LOS into SDD and SLD (TURP: LOS = 1-3 days, HoLEP and GL-PVP: LOS = 1-2 days); those with longer LOS were excluded. Patients were matched 1:1 by age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index score. We compared 30-day unplanned readmissions, reoperations, and Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications between SLD and SDD, and evaluated predictors of adverse outcomes using logistic regression. Results: Most GL-PVP patients underwent SDD, compared to a minority of TURP and HoLEP patients. SDD utilization increased, remained stable, and decreased over time for HoLEP, TURP, and GL-PVP, respectively. For 46,898 included cases (31,872 TURP, 2,901 HoLEP, 12,125 GL-PVP), rates of reoperation, CD I/II, or CD IV complications were comparable before and after matching. Compared to SLD, 30-day unplanned readmission rates for matched SDD patients were lower following TURP (3.48% vs 4.25%, P = .013) and HoLEP (1.93% vs 4.43%, P = .003). On multivariate regression, SLD correlated with unplanned readmission after TURP and HoLEP for both unmatched and matched cohorts. Conclusion: For appropriately selected patients, SDD after TURP, HoLEP, and GL-PVP did not confer increased risk of 30-day complications, suggesting patient selection for SDD is being done with appropriate safety nationally.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125711939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.037
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.037
M3 - Article
C2 - 35139412
AN - SCOPUS:85125711939
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 165
SP - 59
EP - 66
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
ER -