The Utility of Leadless Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacemaker Implantation as a Novel Alternative to a Traditional Pacemaker During Pregnancy

Meet Shah, Ashkan Hashemi, Felix Afriyie, Inderjit Singh, Hyoeun Kim, Emad F. Aziz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Micra™ leadless pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) is indicated for the management of symptomatic bradycardia and advanced heart block. However, the safety of this procedure during pregnancy has not been studied. Here, we present a unique case of Micra™ leadless pacemaker implantation (MLP) in a 31 weeks pregnant patient with intermittent complete heart block who presented with multiple syncopal episodes. The patient underwent an MLP implantation with <40 mGy radiation exposure (about 0.6 min of total fluoroscopy time), which is deemed a negligible dose of radiation exposure during pregnancy. Her subsequent hospital course was uneventful, and she was safely discharged home and was able to continue her pregnancy and delivery without further syncopal episodes or incidence of heart block.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5558-5562
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Leadless pacemaker
  • Micra™
  • pregnancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Utility of Leadless Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacemaker Implantation as a Novel Alternative to a Traditional Pacemaker During Pregnancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this