Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The use of referenced-EEG (rEEG) in assisting medication selection for the treatment of depression

  • Charles DeBattista
  • , Gustavo Kinrys
  • , Daniel Hoffman
  • , Corey Goldstein
  • , John Zajecka
  • , James Kocsis
  • , Martin Teicher
  • , Steven Potkin
  • , Adrian Preda
  • , Gurmeet Multani
  • , Len Brandt
  • , Mark Schiller
  • , Dan Iosifescu
  • , Maurizio Fava

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of rEEG®-guided pharmacotherapy for the treatment of depression in those circumstances where rEEG and STAR*D provided different recommendations. Materials and methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, parallel group, 12 center, US study of rEEG-guided pharmacotherapy vs. the most effective treatment regimens reported in the NIH sponsored STAR*D study. Relatively treatment-resistant subjects ≥18 years who failed one or more antidepressants were required to have a QIDS-16-SR score ≥13 and a MADRS score ≥26 at baseline. All subjects underwent a washout of all current medications (with some protocol-specified exceptions) for at least five half-lives before receiving a QEEG and rEEG report. Subjects randomized to rEEG were assigned a regimen based on the rEEG report. Control subjects who had failed only SSRI's in their current episode were randomized to receive venlafaxine XR. Control subjects who had failed antidepressants from ≥2 classes of antidepressants were randomized to receive a regimen from Steps 2-4 of the STAR*D study. Treatment lasted 12 weeks. The primary outcome measures were change from baseline for self-rated QIDS-SR16 and Q-LES-Q-SF. Results: A total of 114 subjects were randomized and 89 subjects were evaluable. rEEG-guided pharmacotherapy exhibited significantly greater improvement for both primary endpoints, QIDS-SR16 (-6.8 vs. -4.5, p<0.0002) and Q-LES-Q-SF (18.0 vs. 8.9, p<0.0002) compared to control, respectively, as well as statistical superiority in 9 out of 12 secondary endpoints. Conclusions: These results warrant additional studies to determine the role of rEEG-guided psychopharmacology in the treatment of depression. If these results were confirmed, rEEG-guided pharmacotherapy would represent an easy, relatively inexpensive, predictive, objective office procedure that builds upon clinical judgment to guide antidepressant medication choice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-75
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antidepressants
  • Biomarkers
  • QEEG
  • REEG
  • Resistant depression
  • Response prediction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The use of referenced-EEG (rEEG) in assisting medication selection for the treatment of depression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this