The unfinished saga of invasive procedures for secondary mitral regurgitation

Danie Grinberg, William Uhlrich, Sophie Thivolet, Rémi Buzzi, Gilles Rioufol, Jean Francois Obadia, Matteo Pozzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart disease. Its prognostic burden in patients suffering from idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction/dilation has been clearly demonstrated. Severe secondary MR is associated with an increased mortality and frequent heart failure hospitalizations. Although guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is the cornerstone of the management of secondary MR, a certain proportion of patients remain symptomatic. For these patients, several surgical techniques have been progressively developed during the last few decades (replacement, repair, sub-valvular apparatus interventions and other ventricular approaches). In the absence of evidence-based medicine, the benefits of these surgical procedures remains controversial, leading to a low level of recommendation in the guidelines. One way to anticipate the future is to look to the past. Recent prospective randomized trials evaluated surgical and percutaneous techniques and led to a better understanding of how best to treat this disease. In this article, we aim to describe the saga of the surgical and percutaneous treatments for secondary MR throughout the previous decades.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-74
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • MitraClip
  • Secondary mitral regurgitation (secondary MR)
  • mitral valve repair (MVr)
  • mitral valve replacement (MVR)
  • percutaneous procedures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The unfinished saga of invasive procedures for secondary mitral regurgitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this