TY - JOUR
T1 - The STARBRITE trial
T2 - A randomized, pilot study of B-type natriuretic peptide - Guided therapy in patients with advanced heart failure
AU - Shah, Monica R.
AU - Califf, Robert M.
AU - Nohria, Anju
AU - Bhapkar, Manju
AU - Bowers, Margaret
AU - Mancini, Donna M.
AU - Fiuzat, Mona
AU - Stevenson, Lynne W.
AU - O'Connor, Christopher M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The STARBRITE trial was sponsored by the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology/Merck Foundation, and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. The trial was conducted at 3 centers with extensive experience in HF disease management: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. The Duke Clinical Research Institute was the data coordinating center and performed all statistical analyses. There was an independent data safety monitoring board. The Institutional Review Boards of the participating centers approved the protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from each of the patients.
Funding Information:
Dr. Mancini: consulting fees for Celladon Corporation and Acorn. Dr. O’Connor and Fiuzat: research funding from Roche Diagnostics.
Funding Information:
Funding: American Heart Association National Scientist Development Award, ACC/Merck Foundation Career Development Award, and the Duke Clinical Research Institute Faculty Development Award. Biosite Diagnostics provided BNP meters and assays.
PY - 2011/8
Y1 - 2011/8
N2 - Background: STARBRITE, a multicenter randomized pilot trial, tested whether outpatient diuretic management guided by B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and clinical assessment resulted in more days alive and not hospitalized over 90 days compared with clinical assessment alone. Methods and Results: A total of 130 patients from 3 sites with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% were enrolled during hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and randomly assigned to therapy guided by BNP and clinical assessment (BNP strategy) or clinical assessment alone. The clinical goal was resolution of congestion without hypotension or renal dysfunction. In the BNP arm, therapy was adjusted to achieve optimal fluid status, defined as the BNP level and congestion score obtained at the time of discharge. In the clinical assessment arm, therapy was titrated to achieve optimal fluid status, represented by the patient's signs and symptoms at the time of discharge. Exclusion criteria were serum creatinine >3.5 mg/dL and acute coronary syndrome. Follow-up was done in HF clinics. BNP was measured with the use of a rapid assay test. There was no significant difference in number of days alive and not hospitalized (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.41-1.27; P = .25), change in serum creatinine, or change in systolic blood pressure (SBP). BNP strategy was associated with a trend toward a lower blood urea nitrogen (24 mg/dL vs 29 mg/dL; P = .07); BNP strategy patients received significantly more angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers, and the combination of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker plus beta-blockers. Conclusions: BNP strategy was not associated with more days alive and not hospitalized, but the strategy appeared to be safe and was associated with increased use of evidence-based medications.
AB - Background: STARBRITE, a multicenter randomized pilot trial, tested whether outpatient diuretic management guided by B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and clinical assessment resulted in more days alive and not hospitalized over 90 days compared with clinical assessment alone. Methods and Results: A total of 130 patients from 3 sites with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% were enrolled during hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and randomly assigned to therapy guided by BNP and clinical assessment (BNP strategy) or clinical assessment alone. The clinical goal was resolution of congestion without hypotension or renal dysfunction. In the BNP arm, therapy was adjusted to achieve optimal fluid status, defined as the BNP level and congestion score obtained at the time of discharge. In the clinical assessment arm, therapy was titrated to achieve optimal fluid status, represented by the patient's signs and symptoms at the time of discharge. Exclusion criteria were serum creatinine >3.5 mg/dL and acute coronary syndrome. Follow-up was done in HF clinics. BNP was measured with the use of a rapid assay test. There was no significant difference in number of days alive and not hospitalized (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.41-1.27; P = .25), change in serum creatinine, or change in systolic blood pressure (SBP). BNP strategy was associated with a trend toward a lower blood urea nitrogen (24 mg/dL vs 29 mg/dL; P = .07); BNP strategy patients received significantly more angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers, and the combination of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker plus beta-blockers. Conclusions: BNP strategy was not associated with more days alive and not hospitalized, but the strategy appeared to be safe and was associated with increased use of evidence-based medications.
KW - BNP-guided therapy
KW - diuretics
KW - heart failure
KW - heart failure disease management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80955177657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.04.012
DO - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.04.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 21807321
AN - SCOPUS:80955177657
SN - 1071-9164
VL - 17
SP - 613
EP - 621
JO - Journal of Cardiac Failure
JF - Journal of Cardiac Failure
IS - 8
ER -