The significance of low anti-müllerian hormone levels in young women undergoing in vitro fertilization

Caitlin Haswell, Estil Strawn, Aniko Szabo, Joseph Davis, Katherine D. Schoyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if young women (aged ≤35 years) with low anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle have lower pregnancy rates as compared to young women with normal AMH levels. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Thirty-two women with an AMH <1 ng/mL and 130 with an AMH ≥1 ng/mL met study criteria. Patients with AMH <1 ng/ mL had higher average FSH levels (8.1 mIU/mL vs. 6.5 mIU/mL) and were slightly older (31.6 vs. 30.4 years). Both groups had comparable numbers of embryos transferred (AMH <1, 1.5±0.6 vs. AMH ≥1, 1.3±0.5). Clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were higher in women with AMH ≥1 ng/mL (47.6% vs. 21.9%). A sensitivity analysis demonstrated lower clinical pregnancy rates in those with AMH <1 ng/mL when excluding those patients with abnormal day 2 FSH or estradiol. CONCLUSION: AMH levels <1 ng/mL in women ≤35 years old appear to predict lower clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing IVF, even in the setting of normal day 2-3 ovarian reserve testing. Providers may consider transferring 2 embryos in women ≤35 years with low AMH values. AMH may be used as a sole measure of ovarian reserve in young women if significantly low.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-103
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of reproductive medicine
Volume63
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-Mullerian hormone
  • Antimullerian hormone
  • Assisted reproductive techniques
  • Assisted reproductive technologies
  • Diminished ovarian reserve
  • In vitro fertilization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The significance of low anti-müllerian hormone levels in young women undergoing in vitro fertilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this