Abstract
Oral anti-diabetic agents have been associated with adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes (DM2). We investigated the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and mortality using multivariable Cox models in a retrospective cohort of 20,450 DM2 patients from our electronic health record (EHR). We observed no differences in CAD risk among the agents. Metformin was associated with a reduced risk of CHF (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91) and mortality (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.64) when compared to sulfonylurea. Pioglitazone was also associated with a lower risk of mortality when compared to sulfonylurea (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.81). No other significant differences were found between the oral agents. In conclusions, our results did not identify an increased CAD risk with rosiglitazone in clinical practice. However, the results do reinforce a possible increased risk of adverse events in DM2 patients prescribed sulfonylureas.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 145-154 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Acta Diabetologica |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Antidiabetic agents
- Congestive heart failure
- Coronary artery disease
- Hypoglycemic agents
- Mortality
- Rosiglitazone
- Thiazolidinediones
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The risk of developing coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure, and overall mortality, in type 2 diabetic patients receiving rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, metformin, or sulfonylureas: A retrospective analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver