The relationship of praise/criticism to learning during obstetrical simulation: A randomized clinical trial

Aims: The effect of positive vs. negative comments (praise vs. criticism) on trainees' subsequent cognitive and technical performance is unknown, but of potential importance. We performed a randomized trial of giving either praise or criticism during simulated normal vaginal deliveries (using a high-fidelity birthing simulator) to assess the differential effect of these types of comments on students' cognitive and technical performance, and perceived confidence after their learning experience. Methods: Medical and nursing students underwent stratified randomization to praise or criticism. Students (n = 59) initially participated in a teaching demonstration and practiced normal spontaneous vaginal delivery using a birthing simulator. A baseline assessment of cognitive and technical skills, and of self-confidence, was followed by a second simulation during which positive or negative comments were given using standardized scripts. Cognitive performance, technical performance and confidence measures were then scored again. Results: Cognitive and technical performance scores in the "praise" group improved significantly by 2.5 (P = 0.007) and 1.8 (P = 0.032), respectively, while those in the "criticism" group remained unchanged. The self-reported confidence scores did not show any significant change from baseline in either group. Conclusions: Praise strengthens students' cognitive and technical performances, while criticism does not.