The recipient CCR5 variation predicts survival outcomes after bone marrow transplantation

  • Tomohiro Horio
  • , Shohei Mizuno
  • , Kaori Uchino
  • , Motonori Mizutani
  • , Ichiro Hanamura
  • , J. Luis Espinoza
  • , Makoto Onizuka
  • , Koichi Kashiwase
  • , Yasuo Morishima
  • , Takahiro Fukuda
  • , Yoshihisa Kodera
  • , Noriko Doki
  • , Koichi Miyamura
  • , Takehiko Mori
  • , Akiyoshi Takami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The chemokine receptor CCR5 plays roles in the trafficking of effector cells towards the site of inflammation. We retrospectively examined the impact of the CCR5 variation (rs1800023, -2086A > G) on transplant outcomes in a cohort of 329 patients who underwent unrelated HLA-matched bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for hematologic malignancies through the Japan Marrow Donor Program. A multivariate analysis showed that the recipient CCR5 -2086A/A genotype was significantly associated with a lower relapse rate but not with the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or transplant-related mortality, thereby resulting in better disease-free and overall survival rates than other variations. The donor CCR5 -2086A/A genotype was associated with a lower incidence of grades 3–4 acute GVHD, which did not improve the survival outcomes. These findings suggest that the recipient CCR5 -2086A/A genotype affects the induction of the graft-versus-tumor effect without augmenting the development of GVHD. CCR5 genotyping in transplant recipients may therefore be a useful tool for evaluating pretransplantation risks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-39
Number of pages6
JournalTransplant Immunology
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bone marrow transplantation
  • CCR5
  • Graft-versus-host disease
  • Single nucleotide variation
  • Unrelated donor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The recipient CCR5 variation predicts survival outcomes after bone marrow transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this