TY - JOUR
T1 - The psychosis risk syndrome and its proposed inclusion in the DSM-V
T2 - A risk-benefit analysis
AU - Corcoran, Cheryl M.
AU - First, Michael B.
AU - Cornblatt, Barbara
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this study was provided by NIMH K23 MH066279-01, the Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research at Columbia University and the Lieber Center for Schizophrenia Research. None of these funding sources had any further role in the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - The inclusion of a psychosis risk syndrome has been proposed for the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The appropriateness of inclusion of this new risk syndrome in the DSM depends on a careful analysis of both anticipated benefits and risks. Purported benefits include early recognition and case identification, and the hypothetical benefit of preventive intervention of psychotic disorders, for which there is as yet no clear evidence base. However, there is a potential for high rates of false positives particularly at the community level given the difficulty in discriminating mild symptoms from normal variants and low base rates of the syndrome in the general population. High false-positive rates in and of themselves are not necessarily problematic if the risk-benefit ratio is significantly favorable, as with screening for cardiovascular risk factors. For the psychosis risk syndrome, by contrast, there are substantial risks, for both stigma and discrimination, and for unnecessary exposure to antipsychotic medications, which make the high false-positive rate associated with the psychosis risk designation particularly problematic. More research is needed to improve the positive predictive value of the psychosis risk syndrome so that it can be considered for inclusion in future editions of the DSM.
AB - The inclusion of a psychosis risk syndrome has been proposed for the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The appropriateness of inclusion of this new risk syndrome in the DSM depends on a careful analysis of both anticipated benefits and risks. Purported benefits include early recognition and case identification, and the hypothetical benefit of preventive intervention of psychotic disorders, for which there is as yet no clear evidence base. However, there is a potential for high rates of false positives particularly at the community level given the difficulty in discriminating mild symptoms from normal variants and low base rates of the syndrome in the general population. High false-positive rates in and of themselves are not necessarily problematic if the risk-benefit ratio is significantly favorable, as with screening for cardiovascular risk factors. For the psychosis risk syndrome, by contrast, there are substantial risks, for both stigma and discrimination, and for unnecessary exposure to antipsychotic medications, which make the high false-positive rate associated with the psychosis risk designation particularly problematic. More research is needed to improve the positive predictive value of the psychosis risk syndrome so that it can be considered for inclusion in future editions of the DSM.
KW - DSM-V
KW - Positive predictive validity
KW - Prodrome
KW - Psychosis risk syndrome
KW - Ultra high risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954141937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.018
DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 20381319
AN - SCOPUS:77954141937
SN - 0920-9964
VL - 120
SP - 16
EP - 22
JO - Schizophrenia Research
JF - Schizophrenia Research
IS - 1-3
ER -